Federal Reports

OIG is pleased to announce our risk-based Biennial Audit Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022–2023. The OIG Biennial Audit Plan includes eight statutorily mandated audits and eight discretionary audits of the AbilityOne Program. Throughout the 2022–2023 audit cycle, OIG will continue to focus on high-risk areas in the program and operations, as well as aspects of the Program related to the pandemic.This plan provides a detailed roadmap for independent and objective audits focused on enhancing confidence in the program, increasing economies and efficiencies, and fostering program growth, while preventing and detecting fraud, waste, and abuse.Our process to select and prioritize our planned work included assessing the top management and performance challenges, congressional interests, the results of our prior work, and key risks that Commission staff identified. OIG then used this information to inform discussions with Commission Members as well as members of the Commission’s executive leadership team about audits that will help improve Commission work and advance operations.

OIG evaluated APHIS’ controls to ensure compliance with the AWA and followed up on agency actions in response to a previous audit; OIG could not fully evaluate APHIS’ controls due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

What We Looked AtThe Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) provides the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) with funds appropriated by Congress--approximately $2 billion for fiscal year 2020 and over $3.7 billion in supplemental appropriations for the response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. Congress has also authorized FRA to use a portion of the annual Amtrak appropriations for its grant administration and oversight. Given FRA's role in overseeing this large Federal investment, we initiated this audit to assess FRA's program to oversee Amtrak's use of Federal funding.What We FoundFRA has not fully adopted a grants management framework for its Amtrak oversight program. It lacks measurable goals and metrics, complete policies and procedures to assess Amtrak's adherence to requirements, and a centralized grants management system. In 2017, FRA began to develop a strategic vision and focus areas for its Amtrak agreements but has not formalized measurable goals or metrics to assess progress in meeting them. Furthermore, FRA's policies and procedures are incomplete on documenting, tracking, and taking action on Amtrak noncompliance that FRA identifies during monitoring. Finally, FRA does not fully use its centralized grant information system to document and analyze findings from its monitoring reviews of Amtrak. According to FRA officials, the program's strategic framework and policies and procedures are incomplete because FRA focused first on improving the information Amtrak provides; these improvements enhanced FRA's ability to understand Amtrak's use of Federal funding. Officials also indicated that Amtrak's unique legal status limits actions FRA can take to prompt Amtrak to remedy problems the Agency identifies and Amtrak's reporting requirements present challenges for FRA to adapt its grants management information system to help oversee Amtrak's Federal funding. These weaknesses may hinder FRA's ability to assess its program's effectiveness, improve the program, and maximize returns on investment in AmtrakRecommendationsFRA concurred with our four recommendations to help improve its oversight of Amtrak's use of Federal funding. We consider these recommendations resolved but open pending completion of planned actions.

The objectives of our inspection were to describe 1. the involvement of the U.S. Department of Education (Department) in transactions among Education Management Corporation, Dream Center Education Holdings, LLC (Dream Center), Education Principle Foundation, and Studio Enterprise Manager, LLC, and the steps the Department took to protect students and taxpayers; 2. how the Department drew down and applied surety funds from letters of credit for Education Management Corporation and Dream Center and how the Department ensured that the surety funds were used in accordance with the terms of the provisional program participation agreements and any other requirements; and 3. how the Department ensured that Dream Center complied with requirements for drawing down and disbursing Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (Title IV), program funds.During and after Federal Student Aid’s (FSA) preacquisition review, the Department identified significant financial risks associated with Dream Center’s purchase of 13 postsecondary schools, including Dream Center’s loss of the financial backing of an investor who was to provide at least 50 percent of the capital for the purchase, Dream Center’s lack of experience investing in or operating schools participating in the Title IV programs, potential cash flow issues, and more than a decade of failing financial health scores for all 13 schools.