VA is responsible for negotiating Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) prices (volume discounts) for billions of dollars of pharmaceuticals on behalf of all federal agencies. This review examined how VA administers temporary price reductions (TPRs) and the impact on government-wide contract negotiations when VA accepted TPRs offered only to certain government agencies and not all authorized FSS users. The VA OIG found that the National Acquisition Center has been routinely facilitating the award of TPRs that benefit certain agencies and exclude other authorized users. In many instances, the TPRs were exclusive to VA, resulting in additional savings for VA but not other federal agencies (sometimes inconsistent with order volume). The OIG found no authority whereby VA may award prices on the FSS for its sole benefit, or only one or more other agencies’ benefits, while allowing other federal agencies to be denied a benefit authorized by law. The OIG determined that restricting TPRs under FSS pharmaceutical contracts resulted in taxpayers paying $602 million more over two years than if all authorized users government-wide were charged the lowest TPRs for the same pharmaceuticals. Agency-specific TPRs also appear to have negatively impacted the negotiation and establishment of some FSS prices, including statutory federal ceiling prices for covered drugs. TPRs were processed as unilateral modifications, contrary to standard contracting procedures. Also, TPRs were not published as required for FSS prices, potentially reducing competition. The OIG made four recommendations, including developing and implementing a policy that prohibits agency-specific TPRs on FSS contracts, developing a policy for TPRs that exceed one year, and consulting with appropriate authorities regarding the legality of confidentiality provisions and unilateral contract modifications in FSS contracts. The OIG found VA’s nonconcurrence with the OIG recommendation to stop agency-specific TPRs to be without legal merit. VA concurred with the other three recommendations.
| Report Date | Agency Reviewed / Investigated | Report Title | Type | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Veterans Affairs | The Impact of VA Allowing Government Agencies to Be Excluded from Temporary Price Reductions on Federal Supply Schedule Pharmaceutical Contracts | Review | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | The FDIC’s Compliance with the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014 | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council | GULF COAST RESTORATION - DATA Act: Council Met DATA Act Reporting Requirements but Data Accuracy Could be Improved | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Department of Health & Human Services | Medicare Home Health Agency Provider Compliance Review: Angels Care Home Health | Audit |
|
View Report | |
| Department of Health & Human Services | Medicare Allowable Amounts for Certain Orthotic Devices Are Not Comparable With Payments Made by Select Non-Medicare Payers | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Federal Labor Relations Authority | Evaluation of the Federal Labor Relations Authority's Compliance with the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 for Fiscal Year 2019 | Inspection / Evaluation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Troubled Asset Relief Program | Investigation Summary -- Ataollah Aminpou | Investigation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Troubled Asset Relief Program | Investigation Summary -- Michael Ashley | Investigation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Troubled Asset Relief Program | Investigation Summary -- Joseph Edward Waesche | Investigation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Troubled Asset Relief Program | Investigation Summary -- Patricia Zavala | Investigation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |