Federal Reports

We investigated allegations that two National Park Service (NPS) managers violated contracting regulations and procedures by using the Standard Form 182 (SF-182), which is meant to fund standardized training, to pay a company for extended work on an internal NPS training website. We also investigated allegations that NPS employees improperly hired NPS retirees and then re-issued or re-activated their Personal Identity Verification (PIV) cards.We found that the two NPS managers, who oversaw aspects of NPS training programs, improperly used the SF-182 to pay a company $1,041,117 to develop and maintain an internal training website, circumventing contracting regulations. The two NPS managers have since left the agency.We also found that one of the managers retained his PIV card after retiring and had another employee re-enable the card after he left Federal service, in violation of departmental policy. We also discovered a separate instance in which an NPS retiree performed fiscal and budget-related services for an NPS training center without a contract. The NPS retiree received a new PIV card under the guise of an unrelated contract.

The OIG investigated an allegation that an employee with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs (AS-IA) may have improperly used entities that he owned or had a financial interest in to perform work at the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI).We found that the employee was involved in choosing two unregistered entities with whom he or other DOI staff had personal relationships and repeatedly paid them with a charge card, rather than establish a contract as required. The employee violated DOI policy and Federal regulations by misusing his Government charge card; asking for and receiving cash from the entities while they performed work for the DOI; issuing numerous payments to the entities with no supporting documentation; and submitting altered invoices during an internal charge card review as support for payments he made. We also found the employee personally received funds from the DOI for a private group he operated, and he did not file a financial disclosure as required by his position.The U.S. Department of Justice declined prosecution and the employee left Federal service.