An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Veterans Affairs
Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection of the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center in Alabama
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program report provides a focused evaluation of the quality of care delivered in the inpatient and outpatient settings of the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center and one outpatient clinic in Alabama. The inspection covers key clinical and administrative processes that are associated with promoting quality care. For this inspection, the areas of focus were Leadership and Organizational Risks; Quality, Safety, and Value; Medical Staff Privileging; Environment of Care; Medication Management: Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Pain; Mental Health: Suicide Prevention Program; Care Coordination: Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions; Women’s Health: Comprehensive Care; and High-Risk Processes: Reusable Medical Equipment. The executive leaders worked together for four months; however, the Director and the Associate Director for Patient Care Services had worked together since 2015. Survey results revealed opportunities for the Associate Director for Patient Care Services to improve employee satisfaction. Survey data indicated that patients were generally satisfied with their care experiences, but there were opportunities to improve appointment wait times. Review of the medical center’s accreditation findings, sentinel events, and disclosures did not identify any substantial organizational risks. However, the OIG identified concerns regarding peer review and patient safety programs. The executive leaders were extremely knowledgeable within their scope of responsibilities about Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning data and should continue to act to sustain and improve performance. The OIG issued 14 recommendations for improvement in five areas: (1) Environment of Care • Emergency egress accessible • Wheelchair maintenance (2) Mental Health • Community outreach • Patient follow-up (3) Care Coordination • Goals of care conversations • Multidisciplinary committee representatives and activities (4) Women’s Health • Staffing requirements (5) High-Risk Processes • Equipment inventory file • Instrument tracking system • Annual risk analysis • Environmental cleanliness • Sterile area climate control • Staff training
This memorandum is Sensitive But Unclassified. To obtain further information, please contact the OIG Office of Counsel at OIGCounsel@oig.treas.gov, (202) 927-0650, or by mail at Office of Treasury Inspector General, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC 20220.
The unclassified version of the SAR covers the period from October 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020, and reflects what the NSA OIG could release publicly about its work for that reporting period. The OIG issued 10 reports and oversight memoranda during the period, making 94 recommendations to assist the Agency in addressing the findings and deficiencies identified. NSA's management agreed with all OIG recommendations made during this period. The Director of the NSA and Congress received the classified version of the SAR in accordance with the IG Act.
Lead Inspector General Quarterly Report to the U.S. Congress on the East Africa Counterterrorism Operation and the North and West Africa Counterterrorism Operation April 1, 2020?June 30, 2020
Medicare payments may not be made for items or services that “are not reasonable andnecessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of amalformed body member” (Social Security Act (the Act) § 1862(a)(1)(A)). In addition, the Actprecludes payment to any provider of services or other person without information necessaryto determine the amount due the provider (§ 1815(a)).Federal regulations state that the provider must furnish to the Medicare contractor sufficientinformation to determine whether payment is due and the amount of the payment (42 CFR§ 424.5(a)(6)).Claims must be filed on forms prescribed by CMS in accordance with CMS instructions (42 CFR§ 424.32(a)(1)). The Medicare Claims Processing Manual (the Manual) requires providers tocomplete claims accurately so that Medicare contractors may process them correctly andpromptly (Pub. No. 100-04, chapter 1, § 80.3.2.2). The Manual states that providers must useHCPCS codes for most outpatient services (chapter 23, § 20.3).3The Office of Inspector General (OIG) believes that this audit report constitutes credibleinformation of potential overpayments. Upon receiving credible information of potentialoverpayments, providers must exercise reasonable diligence to identify overpayments (i.e.,determine receipt of and quantify any overpayments) during a 6-year lookback period.Providers must report and return any identified overpayments by the later of (1) 60 days afteridentifying those overpayments or (2) the date that any corresponding cost report is due (ifapplicable). This is known as the 60-day rule.4The 6-year lookback period is not limited by OIG’s audit period or restrictions on theGovernment’s ability to reopen claims or cost reports. To report and return overpaymentsunder the 60-day rule, providers can request the reopening of initial claims determinations,submit amended cost reports, or use any other appropriate reporting process.