An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Special Inquiry into Counterfeit, Fraudulent, and Suspect Items in Operating Nuclear Power Plants
We determined that FEMA did not ensure Puerto Rico effectively implemented the STEP Pilot Program following Hurricanes Irma and Maria in September 2017.
Our objective was to determine whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) complied with the National Standards on Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search (TEDS) standards.
Beginning in May 2019, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) piloted Rapid DNA technology to verify claimed parent-child relationships.
2021-0013-INVI-P – Architect of the Capitol (AOC) Employees and Contractors Accused of Noncompliance, obeyed United States Capitol Police (USCP) Orders on January 6
At the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Supply Chain, we examined the cost proposal submitted by a company for transmission construction services. Our examination objective was to determine if the company's cost proposal was fairly stated for a planned 5-year, $25 million contract.In our opinion, the company's cost proposal was overstated. Specifically, the proposed labor markup rates, for recovery of the company's indirect costs, were overstated compared to recent actual costs. We estimated TVA could avoid about $3.5 million over the planned $25 million contract by negotiating reduced markup rates to more accurately reflect the company's recent actual costs. In addition, we found the company's proposed (1) costs for the RFP's fixed price example projects were overstated by $417,189 and (2) equipment rates were not reflective of its actual equipment costs.(Summary Only)
At the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Supply Chain, we examined the cost proposal submitted by a company for transmission construction services. Our examination objective was to determine if the company's cost proposal was fairly stated for a planned 5-year, $100 million contract.In our opinion, the company's cost proposal was overstated. Specifically, the proposed markup rates on craft wages for recovery of the company's indirect costs were overstated compared to recent actual costs. We estimated TVA could avoid about $2.2 million over the planned $100 million contract by negotiating reduced markups to more accurately reflect the company's recent actual costs.(Summary Only)
Audit of the Office on Violence Against Women Legal Assistance for Victims Grant Awarded to the New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, New York, New York
