Federal Reports

The Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Licensing Services, Bureau of Long-Term Care Licensing (State agency), did not always verify nursing homes' correction of deficiencies identified during surveys in calendar year (CY) 2014 in accordance with Federal requirements. For the 100 sampled deficiencies, the State agency verified the nursing homes' correction of 58 deficiencies but did not obtain the nursing homes' evidence of correction for the remaining 42 deficiencies, which were all less serious deficiencies. On the basis of our sample results, we estimated that the State agency did not verify nursing homes' correction of deficiencies in accordance with Federal requirements for 361 (56 percent) of the 650 deficiencies identified during surveys in CY 2014. The State agency's practice for less serious deficiencies was to accept the nursing homes' correction plans as confirmation of substantial compliance without obtaining the required evidence of correction.

Seek link below for the full report, report summary, multimedia or any agency follow-up.

From July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013, the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services (State agency) paid $78.2 million to 73 eligible hospitals in Virginia for Medicaid EHR incentive payments. We reviewed hospitals that received an incentive payment totaling $1 million or more. There were 15 hospitals that each received total incentive payments exceeding $1 million; however, because the State agency contracted with a public accounting firm to perform desk reviews of hospitals' cost reports, we limited our audit to 5 hospitals that were not reviewed by the accounting firm at the time of our audit. The State agency made incorrect EHR incentive payments to two hospitals totaling $38,000. We recommended that the State agency refund the $38,000 in net overpayments made to the two hospitals and adjust the two hospitals' remaining incentive payments to account for the incorrect calculations (which will result in future cost savings of $38,000); and (3) review the calculations for the hospitals not included in the five we reviewed to determine whether payment adjustments are needed, and refund any overpayments identified. In written comments on our draft report, the State agency noted that its public accounting firm conducted post payment audits at the two hospitals and identified additional overpayments that it addressed after we completed our fieldwork.