Federal Reports

The Inspector General Empowerment Act of 2016 mandated that the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) conduct an analysis of critical issues that involve the jurisdiction of more than one individual federal agency. In response, we have consulted within the Inspector General community to determine six high-impact issues where coordination and collaboration would continue to be most beneficial.

In accordance with our annual plan, the United States Capitol Police (USCP or the Department) Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit of the Department’s financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2017, and 2016. Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements in all material respects and render an opinion on controls over financial reporting and report on compliance with laws, regulations, and contracts. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

To view a short video and listen to a podcast relating to this report, please click the link below.

In response to a hotline complaint, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) reviewed allegations that the Carl T. Harden VA Medical Center (VAMC) in Phoenix, AZ did not consistently process beneficiary travel mileage claims. In response, OIG determined whether the VAMC reimbursed beneficiaries more than once for the same travel, approved travel mileage claims using Post Office Boxes instead of physical addresses, and reimbursed beneficiaries primarily through cash or check and not electronic funds transfer (EFT).We did not substantiate the allegation that VAMC staff improperly reimbursed beneficiaries more than once for the same travel. Although we did not substantiate the allegation, we observed the VAMC did not have written procedures requiring staff to perform actions when automated controls alerted them of potential duplicate claims and payments. Although we determined it was not a widespread issue, we substantiated the allegation that VAMC staff inappropriately approved beneficiary travel mileage claims using Post Office Boxes as beneficiaries’ departure addresses instead of physical addresses, which violated policy. We found this occurred because the VAMC lacked a local quality review program to ensure staff document and use physical addresses when calculating mileage reimbursements.We substantiated the allegation that VAMC staff unnecessarily reimbursed most beneficiary travel in cash, rather than by EFT. However, the VAMC Director, appointed in December 2015, supported the facility's adoption of cash reduction goals and approved a plan to advance those measures soon after her appointment. Accordingly, VAMC staff have been implementing this plan, which has resulted in a significant reduction of the VAMC’s percentage of cash payments. Because we confirmed significant actions have been taken, we did not make any recommendations for this area. We made two recommendations. The VAMC Director concurred with our recommendations, and we will perform follow-up on corrective action implementation.