An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
State & Local Reports
Date Issued
Agency Reviewed/Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
State of Kansas
Evaluating the Kansas Department of Labor’s Response to COVID-19 Unemployment Claims (Part 2)
This audit report assessed what factors caused delays in the Kansas Department of Labor’s unemployment claims processing during the COVID-19 pandemic? To answer this question, we spoke with officials from the Kansas Department of Labor (KDOL) and reviewed KDOL staffing, incident, and call center reports. This audit also includes an updated unemployment insurance fraud estimate. In February 2021 we released the first part of this audit. In that audit we reported a preliminary estimate of how much fraud could have occurred in Kansas in 2020. In this report, we used KDOL claims data from January 2020 through February 2021 to provide a more precise estimate
What Was Performed? A special report was performed as a follow-up to a recent survey provided by the State Auditor’s Office to independent pharmacy owners on pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) operations.Why This Engagement? Under the Delaware Code, it is the State Auditor’s job to offer suggestions to improve efficiency and effectiveness in state government. This special report reviews the main concerns of small independent pharmacy owners on how PBM operations affect their businesses. This special report is intended to help lawmakers review and improve laws that regulate PBM behavior.What Was Found? Survey results revealed the pressures being placed on Delaware’s independent pharmacies to close shop and place Delawareans’ healthcare in the hands of large retail establishments.The report highlights a series of takeaways, including:1. Direct and Indirect Remuneration (DIR) fees, decreasing reimbursements, and a lack of state-regulated transparency and accountability have a very high impact on Delaware’s independent pharmacies.2. Delaware’s independent pharmacists report being squeezed by pharmacy benefit managers by means of being forced to accept lower reimbursements, exclusionary formularies, and preferred pharmacies.3. Owners of Delaware’s independent pharmacies unanimously felt that PBMs were an obstacle between the patient and the healthcare provider and that they were largely responsible for increasing drug prices.4. Delaware’s independent pharmacies suffer from similar problems noted in the 2019 National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) survey, which observed that greater oversight is needed.The new special report, “Predatory Practices: Survey Says Middlemen Destroying Delaware’s Independent Pharmacies,” can be found on our website.
What Was Performed? An examination of Cadbury At Lewes Long-Term Healthcare Facility as of June 30, 2017.Why This Report? The State of Delaware is required to ensure the fiscal records at nursing care facilities are retained and properly support the cost report, or the financial report showing the cost and charges related to Medicaid activities that is submitted to the Medicaid Agency. These costs must comply with federal and state regulations. Under the Delaware Medicaid State Plan, the state is required to examine a sample of long-term carefacilities each year. This is to ensure the facility’s cost reports and wage surveys comply with federal and state requirements.What Was Found? The Cadbury At Lewes Long-Term Healthcare Facility examination could not be fully completed because administration could not provide supporting documentation for a portion of the costs (approximately $1.1 million, or 18 percent) that were included on the 2016 report.Because of the lack of documentation, auditors were unable to determine the accuracy of these costs, whether adjustments to these amounts were necessary, and whether management’s assertions related to these costs were accurate. The Examination of Cadbury At Lewes Long-Term Healthcare Facility as of June 30, 2017, can be found on our website.
Pursuant to the Municipal Code of Chicago (MCC) §§ 2-56-030 and -230, the Public Safety section of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) initiated an inquiry into the Chicago Police Department’s (CPD) use of ShotSpotter acoustic gunshot detection technology and CPD’s response to ShotSpotter alert notifications. As part of this ongoing inquiry, OIG has analyzed data collected by CPD and the City of Chicago Office of Emergency Management and Communications (OEMC) regarding all ShotSpotter alert notifications that occurred between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, and investigatory stops confirmed to be associated with CPD’s response to a ShotSpotter alert.In this report, OIG details ShotSpotter’s functionality and descriptive statistics regarding law enforcement activity related to CPD’s response to ShotSpotter alerts. OIG does not issue recommendations associated with this descriptive data. OIG is issuing this analysis of the outcomes of ShotSpotter alerts to provide the public and City government officials—to the extent feasible given the quality of OEMC and CPD’s data—with clear and accurate information regarding CPD’s use of ShotSpotter technology.The City’s three-year contract with ShotSpotter began on August 20, 2018, through August 19, 2021, at a cost of $33 million. In November 2020, well before the end of the contract term, CPD requested an extension of the contract and in December 2020, the City exercised an option to extend it, setting a new expiration date for August 19, 2023. In March 2021, CPD requested approval for an annual 5% increase in the cost per square mile of the contract.OIG’s descriptive analysis of OEMC data and investigatory stop report (ISR) data collected for ShotSpotter alert incidents that occurred between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, revealed the following:A total of 50,176 ShotSpotter alerts were confirmed as probable gunshots by ShotSpotter, issued an event number—a unique record identification number assigned to distinct “events” of police activity—and dispatched by OEMC; each of these resulted in a CPD response to the location reported by the ShotSpotter application.Of the 50,176 confirmed and dispatched ShotSpotter alerts, 41,830 report a disposition—the outcome of the police response to an incident. A total of 4,556 of those 41,830 dispositions indicate that evidence of a gun-related criminal offense was found, representing 9.1% of CPD responses to ShotSpotter alerts.Among the 50,176 confirmed and dispatched ShotSpotter alerts, a total of 1,056 share their event number with at least one ISR, indicating that a documented investigatory stop was a direct result of a particular ShotSpotter alert. That is, at least one investigatory stop is documented under a matching event number in 2.1% of all CPD responses to ShotSpotter alerts. Some of those events are also among those with dispositions indicating that evidence of a gun-related criminal offense was found, where an investigatory stop might have been among the steps which developed evidence of a gun-related criminal offense.Through a separate keyword search analysis of all ISR narratives within the analysis period, OIG identified an additional 1,366 investigatory stops as potentially associated with ShotSpotter alerts whose event number did not match any of the 50,176 confirmed and dispatched ShotSpotter alerts. OIG’s review of a sample of these ISRs indicated that many of these keyword search “hits” were in narratives referring to the general volume of ShotSpotter alerts in a given area rather than a response to a specific ShotSpotter alert.OIG concluded from its analysis that CPD responses to ShotSpotter alerts rarely produce documented evidence of a gun-related crime, investigatory stop, or recovery of a firearm. Additionally, OIG identified evidence that the introduction of ShotSpotter technology in Chicago has changed the way some CPD members perceive and interact with individuals present in areas where ShotSpotter alerts are frequent.
California Department of Housing and Community Development: It Failed to Expedite Access to Federal Funding to Address the Impact of the COVID‑19 Pandemic on California’s Homeless Population
The OIG substantiated the allegation that James Fourcade, Broward County Transit (BCT)’s former director of maintenance, allowed Fraser Tool and Gauge, LLC, a brake kits vendor, to participate in the development of specifications used in a solicitation for a brake kits contract that the county subsequently awarded to Fraser.
California Department of Housing and Community Development: It Failed to Expedite Access to Federal Funding to Address the Impact of the COVID‑19 Pandemic on California’s Homeless Population
The California Department of Housing and Community Development administers the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) program, which received $316 million in federal funding to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic (ESG-CV) for individuals who are at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Th e following report details our conclusion that the department failed to expedite access to federal funding to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the homeless population.
State of Massachusetts, Office of the State Auditor
Report Description
The audit found STCC's spending of federal assistance under the CARES Act has been consistent with federal guidelines. The audit examined March 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020.
What Was Performed? An Examination of the Laurel School District’s Schedule of Construction Projects for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019. Why This Engagement? School construction examination engagements, which are mandated, are performed to determine compliance with Delaware Code, the State of Delaware Department of Education School Construction Technical Assistance Manual, and the State of Delaware Budget and Accounting Policy Manual. This engagement was performed in accordance with 29 Del. C. § 7526 and examines Bond Bill construction project expenditures incurred by the school district. What Was Found? It is my pleasure to report this engagement contained an unmodified opinion.1 In addition, our examination disclosed one finding required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards: • Seventeen purchase orders totaling $15,453,118 were examined, and five of those purchase orders – totaling $12,550,445 – did not have a contract number listed. The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019, Statewide School Districts’ Construction Projects Examination Engagements for Laurel School District can be found on our website.