Investigative Reports

Section 11(d)(9) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency to submit to Congress and the President an annual report on the activities of the Integrity Committee. For more informatoin about the Integrity Committee, please visit the link below.

Review of available records and contacts with ARC staff and vendor and distributor representatives, including oral and written voluntary statements, the absence of witnesses, elapsed time, and the absence of inventory controls contributed to inconclusive determinations about these occurrences

Section 11(d)(9) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency to submit to Congress and the President an annual report on the activities of the Integrity Committee. For more informatoin about the Integrity Committee, please visit the link below.

This investigation was initiated after the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) received a complaint alleging the TVA Board of Directors (Board) failed to give proper notice as required by the Government in the Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act) when the Board selected William D. (Bill) Johnson as TVA's President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO).Our investigation found the following:The Sunshine Act requires public meetings by an executive agency be open to the public. However, as a legal matter, the prevailing view as indicated by the District of Columbia, U.S. Appellate Court, is that notational voting does not constitute a meeting, and it does not constitute a violation of the Sunshine Act. Furthermore, because notational voting does not constitute a meeting as described in the Sunshine Act, notice is not required.In selecting a CEO, the Board decided to use the notational process to protect the privacy of applicants and to address the difficulties of obtaining a quorum at that time.The evidence developed by our investigation shows the Board followed notational procedure by not discussing the candidates' qualifications or otherwise deliberating with one another about the selection. Board members voted separately.Because the Sunshine Act does not prohibit the notational procedure and the evidence demonstrates that the Board properly used that procedure, the Board did not violate the Sunshine Act.