We scheduled an audit of the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) long-term wind power contracts after noting TVA paid about $37.7 million to four wind farm contractors for energy it did not receive between November 1, 2012, and January 3, 2017. Our audit objectives were to determine if (1) TVA's decision to enter into long-term wind power contracts was in TVA's economic interest and (2) the $37.7 million in energy curtailment payments were in TVA's economic interest.TVA's decision to enter into long-term wind power contracts has not proven to be in TVA's economic interest. The decision to enter into the wind power contracts was primarily due to TVA management's assumptions that (1) TVA and other utilities could be required to provide a greater portion of the electricity they sell by using renewable resources, (2) early approval of the wind power contracts would allow TVA to proactively obtain cost effective renewable and clean generation agreements prior to enactment of renewable energy standard legislation, and (3) the wind power contracts were competitive with forecasted market electricity prices. However, the assumptions TVA used in its decision-making process proved to be inaccurate.TVA accepted a significant amount of risk by locking into level fixed prices over the contract terms. TVA relied on net present value (NPV) analyses based in part on long-term forecasts of electricity prices over a 20-year time horizon. TVA's NPV analyses showed most of the contracts to have only a small positive NPV and a significant probability that the NPV would be negative. In addition, TVA's own analyses showed it would only begin to receive value, if any, in the last 10 years of the contracts' 20-year terms.As of TVA's most recent NPV calculation performed in March 2016, the total NPV of these contracts was a negative $1.4 billion. If TVA had issued one initial contract for 200 MW instead of contracting with nine wind farms for approximately 1,700 MW all at once, TVA management could have learned valuable insights into wind power contracting and the related risks.With regard to the $37.7 million in energy curtailment payments TVA made between November 1, 2012, and January 3, 2017, we determined these payments were in TVA's economic interest at the time the decisions were made.We recommended TVA's Senior Vice President, Distributed Energy Resources:Take a measured approach for large projects in areas TVA does not have familiarity or that are new to TVA. For instance, rather than entering into several large contracts in a short period of time, consideration should be given to entering into one small contract to gain a better understanding of the industry and market. Provide positive financial value earlier in future power purchase contract terms by negotiating terms that do not set a level fixed price over the contract term. Instead, use periodic price adjustments (quarterly or annually) based on a specific economic index or escalating the price at a predetermined rate over the contract term.TVA management concurred with our recommendations and noted actions taken to address them.(Summary Only)
| Report Date | Agency Reviewed / Investigated | Report Title | Type | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee Valley Authority | Wind Power Contracts | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Tennessee Valley Authority | Human Resources' Organizational Effectiveness | Inspection / Evaluation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Internal Revenue Service | The Return Review Program Increases Fraud Detection; However, Full Retirement of the Electronic Fraud Detection System Will Be Delayed | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Internal Revenue Service | Prioritization of Collection Cases Is Inconsistent and Systemic Enforcement Actions Are Limited for Inactive Cases | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Commodity Futures Trading Commission | Management Challenges – Fiscal Year 2017 | Top Management Challenges | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Department of Justice | Investigative Summary: Finding of Misconduct by an FBI Supervisory Special Agent for Violations of FBI Policies Regarding the Use, Security, and Maintenance of Firearms | Investigation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| U.S. Postal Service | Retail and Customer Service Operations in the Philadelphia Metropolitan District | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Department of Health & Human Services | CMS Did Not Provide Effective Oversight To Ensure That State Marketplaces Always Properly Determined Individuals' Eligibility for Qualified Health Plans and Insurance Affordability Programs | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Department of Commerce | Awarding of U.S. Census Bureau Noncompetitive Contracts Did Not Consistently Follow Federal Acquisition Regulations and Commerce Acquisition Policies | Audit | Agency-Wide | View Report | |
| Department of the Interior | Evaluation of DOI's Tracking of Data for Land Purchases Made With Grant Funds | Inspection / Evaluation | Agency-Wide | View Report | |