An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Veterans Affairs
Healthcare Facility Inspection of the VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System in Leeds
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System in Leeds.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued one recommendation for improvement in one domain: 1. Environment of care • Leaders assess storage locations outside of standard supply rooms and implement a process to ensure staff remove expired supplies
Financial Audit on USAID Resources Managed by the African Institute for Development Policy Under the Building Capacity for Integrated FP/RH and PED Action Project for the period October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024
Construction Sustainability: USAID/Pakistan Did Not Ensure That Recipients Could Use, Operate, and Maintain the Selected Water Supply System and Schools as Intended
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and Independent Auditors’ Reports
We audited loanDepot.com to evaluate its quality control (QC) program for originating and underwriting Single Family Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans. We selected loanDepot for review based on its loan volume and delinquency rate and because its rate of self-reporting loans to HUD when it identified fraud, material misrepresentations, and other material findings that it could not mitigate was below average for more than a 5-year period.
We found that loanDepot’s QC program for originating and underwriting FHA-insured loans was not sufficient. Specifically, loanDepot (1) did not select the proper number of loans for review and maintain complete and accurate data to document its loan selection process; (2) missed material deficiencies; and (3) did not adequately assess, mitigate, and report loan review findings, which included self-reporting loans to HUD when required. These issues occurred because loanDepot had insufficient controls over its QC program. As a result, HUD did not have assurance that loanDepot’s QC program fully achieved its intended purposes, which include, among other things, protecting the FHA insurance fund and lender from unacceptable risk, guarding against fraud, and ensuring timely and appropriate corrective action.
We recommended that HUD require loanDepot to (1) update its QC plan and related procedures to align with HUD requirements; (2) provide training to its staff and management on HUD requirements for lender QC programs; (3) review the loans that it had not selected and take appropriate actions when applicable; and (4) evaluate its QC files for the loans in which it identified material findings to confirm whether it self-reported to HUD all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that it did not acceptably mitigate.
The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted this self-initiated audit to assess the Central Liquidity Facility (CLF). The objectives of our audit were to determine: (1) whether the NCUA operates the CLF in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, policies, and procedures; and (2) the utilization of the CLF by credit unions covered by the temporary authority granted by the CARES Act.
Results of our audit determined the NCUA operated the CLF in accordance with applicable laws and substantially complied with regulations and its own policies and procedures. We determined the annual stock adjustment done by the CLF was not entirely done in accordance with regulations as the CLF did not receive payments for adjustments to member capital stock subscriptions no later than March 31. However, we determined the financial impact of these payments not being received by March 31 was de minimis. We also determined the CLF was being utilized as evidenced by its growth in members. While we are making no recommendations in our report to management, we are suggesting management determine whether they want to pursue any action to extend the due date beyond March 31st for the annual stock adjustment payments to the CLF.