Federal Reports

In this audit, we sought to determine whether the Department had effective oversight of the programs provided to charter schools and whether it sufficiently monitored State educational agencies to ensure that (1) procedures and internal controls were in place to identify the causes for charter school closures and for mitigating the risks of future charter school closures, (2) close-out procedures for Federal funds received by a charter school are performed in accordance with Federal law and regulations, (3) assets acquired with Federal funds by a charter school that closes are disposed of in accordance with Federal law and regulations, and (4) student information and records from closed charter schools are protected and maintained in accordance with Federal law and regulations.We found that the Department’s oversight and monitoring of the States was not effective to ensure that the States performed the charter school closure process in accordance with Federal laws and regulations. Specifically, we found that the Title I, Individual with Disabilities Education Act, and Charter School Program offices did not always (1) provide adequate guidance to the States regarding their charterschool closure procedures and (2) sufficiently monitor the States to ensure they had adequate internal control systems regarding charter school closures. This occurred because the Department did not consider charter school closures to be a risk to Federal funds, and, therefore, did notprioritize providing guidance to the States on how to manage the charter school closure process or monitor the States’ charter school closure processes. As a result, the Department lacked assurance that the State educational agencies ensured all applicable Federal requirementsfor the closed charter schools were consistently performed and documented. During follow-up work in September and October 2017, we found the program offices had issued some guidance regarding requirements related to charter school closures and also updated some of their State monitoring procedures. These State monitoring procedures addressed some issues related to monitoring and oversight of closed charter schools, but we did not verify whether the new procedures have been fully implemented.

Our audit objective was to determine whether the Denali Commission has adequate internal control over its travel program to ensure that federal funds are being appropriately managed.

Seek link below for the full report, report summary, multimedia or any agency follow-up.

We found that the post’s financial and administrative operations required improvement to comply with agency policies and applicable Federal laws and regulations. Our report contains 15 recommendations directed to the post and headquarters. For the post, our recommendations included that the post store and dispose of medical waste and controlled substances according to policy; that the post strengthen its controls for managing imprest funds and collecting overpayments; and that the post ensure bills of collection are issued in a timely manner.

This evaluation focused on the appropriateness of programming, training, and evaluation; the adequacy of Volunteer support; and the effectiveness of post leadership and management. This report contains 12 recommendations, which, if implemented, should strengthen post operations and correct the deficiencies detailed in the report.

The Office of the Inspector General previously conducted an evaluation of Materials and Transportation Management (M&TM) (Evaluation 2016-15586 issued July 27, 2017) to identify strengths and risks that could affect M&TM’s organizational effectiveness. Our report identified several strengths and risks along with recommendations for addressing those risks. The objective of this follow-up evaluation was to assess management’s actions to address risks included in our initial organizational effectiveness evaluation. In summary, we determined management has taken actions to address most of the risks outlined in our initial organizational effectiveness evaluation, and management actions appear reasonable to address the remaining risks. However, three recommendations remain unresolved, including (1) one manager’s behavior and teamwork at one location, (2) instances where goals were not SMART, and (3) cross functional risks related to business units.

The Corporation for National and Community Service, Office of Inspector General (CNCS-OIG) issued a Management Alert to express our concerns over the following proposed regulatory changes to the Senior Corps Program, which do not appear to have undergone adequate risk assessment prior to the proposed rule-making: (1) Reducing the minimum number of volunteer service hours per week from 15 to 5; and (2) Eliminating the Direct Benefit Ratio or 80/20 Rule, which requires that at least 80 percent of the Federal grant award be expended for volunteer benefits.CNCS-OIG’s analysis suggests that these two changes may increase certain per-volunteer costs, and simultaneously decrease significantly the service hours delivered to the served communities. CNCS has not considered these potential financial and programmatic effects, nor has it undertaken a pilot program to identify any other unintended consequences.We made three recommendations to CNCS, focused on additional analysis and research into potential increased costs and reduction in community service hours. CNCS’s response did not address the concerns substantively, but said that it would do so as part of the rulemaking process.