An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Health & Human Services
The Ohio State University Monitored Subrecipients and Claimed Allowable National Institutes of Health Grant Costs
The Ohio State University monitored subrecipients and claimed costs as a subrecipient in accordance with National Institutes of Health grant polices and Federal regulations. Accordingly, this report contains no recommendations.
Inspector General Oversight Activities in Afghanistan as Required by Section 1217 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2017, Enacted December 23, 2016
This final report documents the results of our audit on the effectiveness of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s (NTIA’s) unliquidated obligation (ULO) review policies and procedures developed since our OIG audit report issued in June 2013 (OIG-13-026-A). In our 2013 report, we concluded that Department-wide controls over the management of ULOs needed strengthening. We also concluded that effective management of outstanding obligation balances allows bureaus to review and deobligate unneeded funds, promoting a better use of federal resources. Our objective for the current audit was to evaluate the effectiveness of NTIA obligation and deobligation practices, as well as review policies and procedures that were implemented, since our June 2013 audit report.
For the period January 1 through December 31, 2013, the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Division of Health Care Services (State agency), did not fully comply with Federal Medicaid requirements for billing manufacturers for some rebates for physician-administered drugs dispensed to enrollees of managed-care organizations (MCOs). The State agency properly billed manufacturers for rebates for drugs associated with the National Drug Codes (NDCs) in our judgmental sample. However, the State agency did not have valid NDCs for other drug utilization data submitted by MCOs for physician-administered drugs, and the State agency did not bill manufacturers for rebates for these drugs. The State agency estimated average rebates per claim billed to manufacturers, and we determined these estimates to be reasonable. We applied the estimates and determined that the State agency did not bill rebates of $5.8 million ($2.9 million Federal share) to manufacturers for physician-administered drug utilization without valid NDCs.
The University of Louisville did not always claim selected costs charged directly to HHS awards in accordance with Federal regulations and, where appropriate, NIH guidelines. In our sample of 120 salary transactions, 102 were allowable but 18 were not. In addition, in our sample of 100 nonsalary transactions, 61 were allowable but 39 were not. These unallowable transactions occurred because the University did not provide adequate oversight to ensure consistent compliance with Federal regulations.