Federal Reports

This report dealing with the review of compliance with the ARC J-1 Visa Waiver program

This report dealing with the review of compliance with the ARC J-1 Visa Waiver program

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $62.3 million in funds received by the Missouri Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) Used payments authorized by Sections 101, 102, and 251 of HAVA in accordance with HAVA and applicable requirements; (2) Accurately and properly accounted for property purchased with HAVA payments and for program income; and (3) met HAVA requirements for Section 251 funds for an election fund, for a matching contribution, and for maintenance of a base level of state outlays.

We performed agreed-upon procedures, requested solely to assist management in determining the validity of the Winning Performance payout awards for fiscal year (FY) ending September 30, 2007. In summary, we found:The FY 2007 Winning Performance goals were properly approved. Actual year-to-date inputs for the sampled metrics agreed with the respective basis worksheet. Actual inputs for the nine TVA-wide metrics agreed with the underlying support provided by the Strategic Business Units, except for the calculation of the Delivered Cost of Power (DCOP) metric, which was inconsistent with the Board-approved formula. This resulted in a one cent overstatement of the calculated DCOP, further resulting in a .25 percent increase in the TVA Scorecard percentage. Management agreed and made the appropriate correction during the engagement. Also, in applying the procedures, we noted the Fuel Cost Adjustment (FCA) metric improperly included Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant precommercial costs. The FCA metric approved by the Board did not include these costs. Including these costs in the FCA metric resulted in an 8.25 percent overstatement in the TVA Scorecard percentage. After discussion with management, these costs were removed from the FCA metric and subsequently included in the DCOP metric. A revised payout report was provided for retesting. We noted during retesting, the precommercial costs were properly excluded from the FCA metric and included in the DCOP metric. We further noted Allowance for Funds Used During Construction was added to the DCOP metric. The payout percentages were recalculated by the OIG based on the changes to the DCOP metric noted above. Summary Only