An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
International Trade Commission
Management Report Fiscal Year 2025 Charge Card Risk Assessment
HUD’s Office of Housing contracts with performance-based contract administrators to administer the housing assistance payments (HAP) contract with owners. Through RAD, HUD oversees the HAP contracts for converted properties and monitors owners for compliance with HUD’s requirements, which include maintaining (1) units in decent, safe, and sanitary condition and (2) reserve for replacement accounts to help defray the cost of replacing properties’ capital items.
We found HUD needs to improve its oversight of the physical condition of public housing units that converted to PBRA and FHA-insured PBV under the RAD program. Of the 242 units we observed, 65 percent contained 576 deficiencies, 63 of which were life-threatening deficiencies. Converted properties are required to maintain reserve for replacement accounts to fund extraordinary maintenance, repair, and replacement of capital items. However, owners’ reserve for replacement accounts’ balances were not supported for 13 of the 14 properties reviewed. Further, HUD did not ensure that initial inspections of converted properties occurred in a timely manner.
The unit deficiencies occurred because the properties’ (1) management officials did not ensure that staff or contractors inspected the physical condition of RAD units annually and (2) maintenance departments were understaffed, resulting in delayed inspections and repairs. Further, HUD did not ensure that its staff consistently performed management and occupancy reviews (MOR) to monitor the operation of the properties for compliance with HUD’s requirements for the physical condition of RAD units and reserve for replacement accounts. Specifically, for the properties that we reviewed, HUD’s staff had not conducted (1) initial MORs for 50 percent of the properties even though they had been converted under RAD between 3 to 10 years ago and (2) timely initial MORs for nearly 48 percent of the properties. HUD also did not have a (1) process for monitoring the timeliness of properties’ initial inspections and (2) clear guidance specifying the timing of initial inspections for non-FHA-insured PBRA properties.
As a result, families resided in units that were not decent, safe, and sanitary. Further, there is an increased risk of (1) additional families’ residing in units that are not decent, safe, and sanitary and (2) properties’ reserve for replacement accounts being insufficiently maintained to address extraordinary maintenance, repair, and replacement of capital items. Further, HUD did not have necessary information to determine the (1) initial physical of condition of the units, including identifying deficiencies that require timely corrective actions, and (2) timing of properties’ next inspection, which is based on each property’s previous inspection score.
We made several recommendations to HUD to improve its oversight of properties converted under RAD. Specifically, we made recommendations related to determining the timing and completion of initial and subsequent MORs, including issuing updated guidance that includes a system to track the timeliness of initial MORs. We also made recommendations to provide training to staff members to ensure that they have the skills necessary to complete MORs of converted properties and to review the reserve for replacement account balances for all properties to ensure the accuracy of the account balances. Lastly, we made recommendations for HUD to implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that servicing lenders comply with HUD time requirements in initial inspections of converted properties and determine an appropriate timeframe for when noninsured PBRA converted properties should be initially inspected and work with the Real Estate Assessment Center to ensure that inspections are ordered and completed within that timeframe.
In accordance with the Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010, this report presents the results of the OIG's work over fiscal year 2024 in meeting its performance goals.
In June 2019, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) completed an Integrated Resource Plan and recommended the expansion of solar generating capacity by up to 14,000 megawatts (MW) by 2038. According to TVA’s fiscal year 2020 Sustainability Report, TVA set a sustainability aspiration to achieve 10,000 MW of solar generation by 2035. To help achieve this goal, TVA purchased 3,000 acres to construct an estimated 200 MW solar facility in Lawrence County, Alabama. TVA purchased 139,750 solar panels, totaling $30 million, in December 2019 for installation at the Lawrence County Solar (LCS) project. TVA began receiving these solar panels in late January 2020 and received the final shipment on March 30, 2020. The project was originally estimated to be in service by December 2023. Due to delays in the LCS project, the solar panels purchased in 2019 were transferred to another TVA project. TVA subsequently purchased an additional 581,250 solar panels for $92.7 million in May 2023 for installation at the LCS project.
TVA’s Standard Programs and Processes 34.000, Project Management, states risk assessments should be performed as early as possible in a project to identify critical technical, performance, schedule, and cost risks. Due to the length of time the solar panels purchased in 2019 for the LCS project have been in inventory, we performed an audit of TVA’s assessment of risks associated with solar panel purchases for the LCS project. Our audit objective was to determine if TVA assessed risks in accordance with applicable policies and procedures prior to the purchase of solar panels for the LCS project. Our audit scope included the solar panels purchased in calendar years 2019 and 2023.
We determined TVA (1) did not perform a risk assessment prior to purchasing solar panels in 2019 and (2) only performed a partial risk assessment prior to the purchase of the 2023 solar panels. Additionally, the solar panels purchased in 2023 were procured after the project had been placed on hold by TVA.