An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
We completed agreed-upon procedures to assist the Center for Resource Solutions (CRS) in determining TVA's compliance with the annual reporting requirements of CRS' Green Pricing Accreditation Program for the year ended December 31, 2007. The required information on TVA's renewable energy initiative, "Green Power Switch," was provided to CRS. No exceptions were identified. Summary Only
EAC OIG audited $19.3 million in funds received by the New Mexico Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) expended HAVA payments in accordance with the Act and related administrative requirements and (2) complied with the HAVA requirements for establishing an election fund, meeting its matching share requirement, and maintaining state expenditures for elections at a level not less than the level expended in fiscal year 2000.
We determined that TCI met requirements in the HEA and regulations for institutional (excluding the 90/10 rule), program, and student eligibility and for award calculations. However, our review disclosed that (1) TCI improperly paid $440,487 to FFEL lenders to pay off its students’ loans and prevent their default; and (2) TCI had internal control deficiencies in the administration of Title IV programs during the period under review.
We reviewed $14.2 million of costs billed to TVA by a contractor for providing right-of-way clearing and restoration services and found:TVA had been overbilled $81,533 including (a) $38,796 in unallowable miscellaneous material costs, (b) $34,776 in duplicate billings for initial clearing costs, and (c) $7,961 in unsupported labor costs. Additionally, we found the contractor had underbilled TVA $5,776 due to various invoicing errors. The contractor agreed with our finding regarding unsupported labor costs and provided explanations for why it believed the remaining items were billed correctly. TVA management agreed with the findings regarding unallowable material costs, unsupported labor costs, and underbilled costs and stated they are conducting a review of the $34,776 in suspected duplicate billings for initial clearing services. Prior to award of the contract, Procurement's contract manager had requested the contractor to change its proposed billing rates to "TVA Valley-wide" rates. That action, which the contractor agreed to, caused TVA's costs to increase $522,212 because most of the rates that had been proposed by the contractor were lower than TVA Valley-wide rates. Procurement informed us that TVA had deployed a strategy to negotiate consistent pricing among all suppliers and that would be more favorable to TVA. Procurement further stated that although some of the prices were higher than the contractor's initial offer, lower prices were achieved in four areas (line items) where TVA expected the majority of the expenditures to take place; however, since the actual quantities of work performed under the various line items were other than anticipated, the resulting charges increased TVA's total cost by approximately 3.7 percent. Procurement plans to use this experience in some lessons-learned sessions. Summary Only
At the request of the Capitol Police Board (Board), the Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit of the United States Capitol Police (USCP or the Department) Memorial Fund (the Fund). Our objectives were to determine if USCP (1) properly accounted for contributions and distributions made to and from the Fund, (2) had established adequate internal controls over Fund processes, and (3) complied with applicable laws and USCP Board regulations pertaining to the management and administration of the Fund.Our scope included contributions and distributions made after the transfer of the Fund from the House of Representatives to USCP in July 2001 through March 31, 2008.