An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Denali Commission
Denali Commission March 2025 Semiannual Report to Congress
I am pleased to present the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Semiannual Report (SAR) to Congress covering the period from October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025.
We reviewed the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF) in Manhattan, Kansas. The audit was performed to evaluate the implementation of physical security controls at NBAF. We reviewed relevant documents and interviewed officials responsible for NBAF’s physical security. Our audit generally covered fiscal year 2023 through the first quarter of fiscal year 2024.
Note: This report contains sensitive content that is being withheld from public release. Any monetary impact amounts redacted from this report are not reflected in monetary totals.
This report was issued in conjunction with the Office of Inspector General for the Railroad Retirement Board's Semiannual Report to the Congress. It was incorporated by reference in the corresponding Semiannual Report which is available at the link below.
The OIG employs modern technologies and tools to ensure good financial management of American taxpayers' investment in the OIG. I have tasked my staff to develop a structured process to identify and perform our high-risk evaluation work. In order to do so, I have also implemented an Effectiveness and Efficiency Review Initiative within OIG. This initiative allows senior OIG staff to collaborate on enhancing our efforts to identify the highest mission-related risk areas, and ultimately conduct targeted evaluations of such areas. This initiative is manned by senior OIG staffers who work together to identify better high-risk areas associated with the Agency’s mission- critical programs and conduct targeted reviews to address risk areas and identify effective and efficient solutions. Applying this new concept within the OIG while merging technologies and other innovative approaches and ideas to our work has aided in improved performance regarding the OIG’s core mission of providing independent, objective, standards-based oversight, and enforcement to protect EEOC programs and the people they serve from fraud, waste, and abuse. Furthermore, the OIG staff has fully returned to the office as required by President Donald Trump’s Executive Order. Our employees have effectively transitioned to in-office posture and continue to maintain high individual and team productivity. I would like to personally thank the OIG's dedicated team of talented professionals who have demonstrated resilience and flexibility during this time of transition. Finally, I would like to congratulate former Commissioner Andrea R. Lucas for being named by President Trump to serve as the Agency’s Acting Chair. We look forward to working with Acting Chair Lucas and her staff in helping to make the EEOC a model workplace. We would also like to thank the EEOC senior leadership for their ongoing cooperation, and Congress for its continuing support of the OIG’s mission.
This report summarizes the results of our fiscal year 2024 Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) evaluation and assessment of the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) information security program. Our objectives were to determine whether SBA complied with FISMA and assessed the maturity of controls used to address risks in each of the nine security domains.
We found SBA generally responded to previously identified vulnerabilities and made progress in one of the nine domains, in the area of security training. The agency met the baseline in the area of incident response but fell below the baseline for an effective security program in several areas. We rated SBA’s overall information security program as “not effective.”
This fiscal year there are seven new recommendations for improvement. There are 11 open recommendations from 3 prior evaluations. Repeat recommendations from prior years were not included in this report because they have not yet been implemented. The agency successfully closed four recommendations from fiscal year 2023. SBA managers agreed with six recommendations and partially agreed with one. Their corrective actions resolved all the recommendations.