Federal Reports

To obtain further information, please contact the OIG Office of Counsel at OIGCounsel@oig.treas.gov, (202) 927-0650, or by mail at Office of Treasury Inspector General, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC 20220

The audit objectives were to determine whether program funds were managed in accordance with the ARC and Federal grant requirements

We audited the costs invoiced by a contractor for retroactive rate adjustments and determined the adjustments were overstated by about $12,000 due to miscellaneous billing errors. The contractor agreed with our findings. Summary Only

We reviewed TVA's contracting process and noted several areas where improvements could result in better contract management and greater contractor compliance with commercial terms and conditions. Although we noted many instances of good practices being performed by various individuals in Procurement and TVA's Strategic Business Units, these practices were not universal. Overall, we noted (1) deficiencies in 40 percent of the 64 contracts reviewed; (2) technical contract managers were approving payments without adequately reviewing pricing on 25 percent of the invoices reviewed; and (3) internal controls were not always followed. Additionally, we surveyed Procurement's contract managers and purchasing agents and a representative sample of TVA's technical contract managers to ask for their input regarding weaknesses and areas of improvement in the contracting process. The survey results were most negative in areas concerning (1) training, (2) workload, and (3) communications. TVA management instituted several initiatives to address most of the issues identified in the report. Summary Only

We audited $3.2 million of costs billed to TVA by a contractor for welding services performed at Browns Ferry and Sequoyah Nuclear Plants by one of its subcontractors and determined TVA had been billed $450,165 for unsupported and ineligible costs. The overbilling included (1) per diem payments that exceeded limitations or were ineligible under the contract, (2) ineligible mobilization/demobilization and travel expenses, (3) unsupported small tools and consumable costs, (4) labor costs that were either unsupported or billed at incorrect rates, and (5) unsupported subcontractor costs. TVA management is reviewing our findings and recommendations. Summary Only

We audited $32.7 million of costs billed to TVA by a contractor providing reload fuel fabrication services for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant and determined TVA had been overbilled $5,545 due to the contractor's use of overstated hours and incorrect labor rates. Additionally, the contract did not have a formal authorization process for certain services to be performed by the contractor and the contractor could not provide documentation of TVA's authorization for some of the services it had billed TVA. The contractor agreed to credit TVA for the overbilled amount. TVA management agreed with our findings and is (1) reconciling the deliverables it received with the compensation paid for the services in question and (2) issuing a contract supplement to confirm how work will be released under the contract. Summary Only