NASA's Compliance with the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014
The Office of Inspector General examined the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of NASA’s financial and award data as required under the DATA Act.
United States
If you are aware of fraud, waste, abuse or misconduct relating to NASA programs and operations, including NASA employees, contracts, subcontracts, grants and sub-grants, you may disclose such information to the NASA OIG Hotline. NASA OIG also has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of whistleblower retaliation involving civil servants (generally the U.S. Office of Special Counsel has primary jurisdiction in this area), contractor and subcontractor employees, grantee and sub-grantee employees and personal services contractors.
Equal Employment Opportunity complaints. These may be filed with the NASA Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity at https://www.nasa.gov/offices/odeo/complaints-efile.
The Office of Inspector General examined the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of NASA’s financial and award data as required under the DATA Act.
The Office of Inspector General released a summary of its fiscal year 2017 examination of NASA’s information security program under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA).
The Office of Inspector General assessed NASA’s progress in improving its information technology governance and security over the past 4 years.
The Office of Inspector General assessed NASA’s management of its spare parts inventory for flight projects and its efforts to reduce project cost by leveraging available resources.
The Office of Inspector General evaluated NASA’s ongoing research that seeks to safely integrate unmanned aircraft systems – more commonly known as “aerial drones” – into the national airspace.