Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
United States
• Waste, fraud, abuse or mismanagement in EAC programs • Irregularities involving a recipient of funds distributed by EAC • Serious wrongdoing or gross mismanagement at EAC • Retaliation or whistleblower reprisal due to disclosure of wrongdoing by an EAC supervisor or EAC management
The EAC OIG generally does NOT investigate the following matters: • Voter fraud (for example, ineligible persons voting, eligible persons voting more than once, persons voting under a false identity, etc.) • Voter registration abnormalities • Election irregularities (for example, vote tampering, voter suppression, mishandling of ballots, etc.) • Campaign financing issues (report such issues to the Federal Election Commission, https://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/) • 911 Emergencies • Equal Employment Opportunity complaints Under the U.S. Constitution, the responsibility for administering elections is reserved specifically to the states. Any problems concerning administration of elections should generally be reported to your local election board, state election official (see https://www.eac.gov/voters/register-and-vote-in-your-state/ for an interactive map with links to your state election official), or, if you suspect criminal behavior, your State Police or state Attorney General. The only Federal agency with jurisdiction to investigate election-related crime is the Department of Justice, which you may contact via your local Assistant United States Attorney (https://www.justice.gov/usao/find-your-united-states-attorney ) or your local office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This report summarizes the oversight work performed by EAC OIG during the 6-month period ended September 30, 2011.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited EAC's financial statements as of September 30, 2009 and for the year then ended. This letter discusses matters involving internal control and other operational matters arising from that audit that should be...
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, conducted an evaluation of EAC's security programs and practices for fiscal year 2008.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, conducted and assessment of EAC's program and financial operations focusing on management processes and controls.
EAC OIG issued this memorandum to alert the EAC Executive Director to additional actions needed to bring EAC into compliance with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and Office of Management and Budget guidelines.
EAC OIG issued this memorandum to alert the EAC Executive Director to noncompliance with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA).
EAC OIG reviewed $84.9 million in funds received by the Office of the Attorney General, New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the review were to assess New Jersey's administration of HAVA funds and compliance with certain HAVA requirements...
EAC OIG reviewed $77.3 million in funds received by the Georgia Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objective of the review was to determine whether Georgia (1) managed HAVA funds in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements...
EAC OIG, through a contract with Department of Interior OIG, audited $8.7 million in funds received by the California Office of the Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to (1) identify those transactions in which funding was used for an unallowable...
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, conducted this audit to determine whether (1) the necessity of using personally identifiable information for processing was properly evaluated; (2) the EAC had established adequate procedures governing the collection...
