Management Challenges for EAC in Fiscal Year 2015, with EAC Response
This report includes EAC OIG’s independent assessment of the top management challenges facing EAC in fiscal year 2015.
United States
• Waste, fraud, abuse or mismanagement in EAC programs • Irregularities involving a recipient of funds distributed by EAC • Serious wrongdoing or gross mismanagement at EAC • Retaliation or whistleblower reprisal due to disclosure of wrongdoing by an EAC supervisor or EAC management
The EAC OIG generally does NOT investigate the following matters: • Voter fraud (for example, ineligible persons voting, eligible persons voting more than once, persons voting under a false identity, etc.) • Voter registration abnormalities • Election irregularities (for example, vote tampering, voter suppression, mishandling of ballots, etc.) • Campaign financing issues (report such issues to the Federal Election Commission, https://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/) • 911 Emergencies • Equal Employment Opportunity complaints Under the U.S. Constitution, the responsibility for administering elections is reserved specifically to the states. Any problems concerning administration of elections should generally be reported to your local election board, state election official (see https://www.eac.gov/voters/register-and-vote-in-your-state/ for an interactive map with links to your state election official), or, if you suspect criminal behavior, your State Police or state Attorney General. The only Federal agency with jurisdiction to investigate election-related crime is the Department of Justice, which you may contact via your local Assistant United States Attorney (https://www.justice.gov/usao/find-your-united-states-attorney ) or your local office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This report includes EAC OIG’s independent assessment of the top management challenges facing EAC in fiscal year 2015.
This report includes EAC OIG’s independent assessment of the top management challenges facing EAC in fiscal year 2010.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $16.6 million in funds received by the Rhode Island Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized...
EAC OIG requested that the Department of Interior OIG investigate an anonymous complaint that SysTest Labs, Incorporated, had falsified the initial and re-certifications of the AutoMark Technical Systems, LLC, Voter Assist Terminal.
EAC OIG requested that the Department of Interior OIG investigate four general issues surrounding a study on voting fraud and voter intimidation.
EAC OIG requested that the Department of Interior OIG investigate the work environment at EAC. The investigation was initiated because of numerous confidential and anonymous complaints received from current and former EAC employees.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $28.7 million in funds received by the Iowa Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized by...
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $33.9 million in funds received by Oregon Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized by...
This report includes EAC OIG’s independent assessment of the top management challenges facing EAC in fiscal year 2011.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $158.5 million in funds received by the Florida Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized by...