Department of Education

We found that the Department did not have a comprehensive plan or strategy to prevent student loan default, and thus could not ensure various Department offices’ efforts were coordinated and consistent. We also found that the roles and responsibilities of the offices and personnel tasked with...

Our audit to determine whether FSA had controls in place to ensure that students who had met or exceeded the Pell grant lifetime eligibility limit did not receive additional Pell grants found that FSA had those controls in place. We found no errors when testing the accuracy of the Lifetime...

We concluded that the Higher Learning Commission did not establish a system of internal control that provided reasonable assurance that schools’ classifications of delivery methods and measurements of student learning for competency-based education programs, including direct assessment programs...

We found that SOLEX College did not disburse Title IV funds only to eligible students enrolled in Title IV-eligible programs. We found that SOLEX College’s two English as a second language programs were not Title IV-eligible programs because SOLEX College did not admit only students who needed...

We found that the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction could improve its administration of its Race to the Top grant by strengthening its system of internal control over contracting and by more closely monitoring the fiscal activity of participating local educational agencies and charter...

We found that FSA did not revise its enforcement procedures and guidance to ensure that they facilitated and did not hinder enforcement actions after the Department eliminated the incentive compensation safe harbors in 2010 and did not develop procedures and guidance instructing employees on how...

We found that the Department established and implemented an extensive and effective process for assessing SEA’s compliance with approved ESEA flexibility requests based on the information the SEAs submitted during monitoring. However, we noted that the Department could improve its oversight of SEAs...

We found that FSA could not ensure that the original DMCS2 contractor, delivered a fully functional system, because FSA did not develop an adequate plan, did not ensure that the contractor met milestones, did not hold the contractor accountable for missed milestones, and did not ensure that system...

We found that the Department did not comply with IPERA for FY 2014 because it reported an improper payment rate that did not meet its reduction target for the Direct Loan program; its improper payment estimates and estimation methodologies were inaccurate, incomplete, and unreliable; and its...

We found significant weaknesses in the processes for performing program reviews. We also found a weakness in selecting schools for program reviews. Program review specialists did not always conduct program reviews in accordance with FSA’s program review procedures. Specifically, required forms and...