An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
State & Local Reports
Date Issued
Agency Reviewed/Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
State of Massachusetts
Audit of the State Library of Massachusetts—George Fingold Library
State of Massachusetts, Office of the State Auditor
Report Description
The audit showed the State Library of Massachusetts has effectively administered the collection and reporting of revenue. The audit examined the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020.
County gross mismanagement and misconduct in time and attendance of county parks employee who held outside employment as a City of Pembroke Pines firefighter
In July 2019, the Broward Office of the Inspector General (OIG) received information alleging that the county was paying Sean Gilmartin, a parks manager at Broward County’s C.B. Smith Park and a City of Pembroke Pines firefighter, for working at the park on days when he was actually working at the fire department. Our investigation substantiated the allegation and found numerous occasions in which Mr. Gilmartin’s timekeeping records showed that he was paid for working at both places at the same time.
The primary objective of this report is to show Missouri's spending of federal assistance in the month of May 2021 for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency and the cumulative financial activity since the state began receiving funding in April 2020.
The primary objective of this report is to show Missouri's spending of federal assistance in the month of June 2021 for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency and the cumulative financial activity since the state began receiving funding in April 2020.
The COVID-19 pandemic drove the Office of the New York State Comptroller to move forward creatively and identify new ways to tap into and analyze data. Auditors and examiners pursued increased data analysis and used a wider variety of data sources in audit planning and risk assessment, including the Statewide Financial System, First New York data warehouse, New York Benefits Eligibility and Accounting System, CVS Health, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration, as well as internal State agency data
This report details the operation of the New York State UI system, the recent history and specific impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Trust Fund, and steps that can be taken to replenish the Trust Fund balance. Working together, New York State, participating employers and the federal government can develop solutions that restore the Trust Fund while allowing the ongoing economic recovery to continue
Department of Administrative Serivies Enterprise Information Services Has Established an IT Governance Framework but Must Do More Regarding Cybersecurity Management
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit of the Department of Finance’s (DOF) administration of the process for designating municipal depositories. Banks designated as depositories hold and pay interest on funds deposited by the City and the Chicago Board of Education, essentially serving as the City’s checking accounts. The objectives of the audit were to determine if DOF ensures that banks applying for designation submit the required information, and whether the designation process serves the City’s goal of partnering with institutions that not only have the capacity to fulfill its banking needs, but also provide financial services to Chicago communities in an inclusive and equitable manner.A community’s access to financing is critical to its prosperity. Financial institutions, however, invest much less in some communities than others. To address this inequality, Chicago and other cities have established responsible banking ordinances (RBOs) to encourage equitable lending by the banks that hold their deposits.DOF administers Chicago’s RBO through a request for proposal (RFP) process to determine banks’ eligibility. The RFP process is intended to identify banks that can meet the City’s financial needs and have demonstrated a commitment to providing equitable lending and other banking services throughout Chicago.The municipal depository designation RFP process occurs annually, as required by state law. DOF solicits and reviews banks’ submissions, then identifies eligible depositories in an ordinance. The ordinance is then transmitted to the City Council’s Committee on Finance. The Committee does not always present the ordinance for consideration by the full Council. When it does, following Council proceedings, the Treasurer’s Office determines which of the eligible depositories will hold the City’s deposits. If the full Council does not consider the ordinance, the list of eligible depositories established by the most recent enacted ordinance remains in effect. This audit focused on DOF’s role as the administrator of the process.OIG concluded that, although DOF ensures that banks submit all documentation required by the RFP, it does not evaluate whether the banks provide inclusive and equitable financial services throughout Chicago. Furthermore, DOF, City Council, and the Treasurer’s Office have not coordinated their roles in the municipal depository designation process to achieve the City’s inclusivity and equity goals.Although DOF ensures banks’ RFP submissions are complete, it does not evaluate the banks’ community investment and equitable lending efforts. DOF does identify potentially predatory loans, such as those with an interest rate higher than the federal funds rate. In these cases, the Department follows up with banks to inquire about the specific conditions underlying the loans. According to current DOF staff, however, they have never declined to designate a bank as a municipal depository on the basis of such lending conduct. Without undertaking a substantive evaluation of each bank seeking designation, DOF cannot identify demographic disparities in banking activity. Banks may then continue to lend inequitably across Chicago while the City continues to partner with them.OIG also found that DOF, City Council, and the Treasurer’s Office have not coordinated their efforts in the municipal depository designation process to achieve the City’s objective of encouraging equitable banking practices. The three entities largely act in isolation, and Council designates depositories infrequently. Because Council has not regularly voted on the designation ordinance, one of the City’s previously active banks was able to keep its designation as a municipal depository until March 2021 despite not having responded to the RFP since 2012, and three banks that responded to multiple RFPs since 2016 did not secure designation until March 2021. Moreover, this lack of coordination has hindered meaningful discussion of alternative banking options that may better align with the City’s equitable banking goals. For example, DOF, City Council, and the Treasurer’s Office have all separately expressed interest in allowing credit unions to become municipal depositories. Members of Council and the Treasurer’s Office have supported separate ordinances addressing this issue, but without a coordinated effort, the initiative has failed to gain traction.