Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content
Report File
Date Issued
Submitting OIG
Department of Veterans Affairs OIG
Agencies Reviewed/Investigated
Department of Veterans Affairs
Components
Veterans Health Administration
Report Number
25-01515-67
Report Description

The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) initiated a healthcare inspection at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (facility) in Indianapolis, Indiana, to assess allegations and concerns related to the availability of on-call interventional radiology services. In May 2024, VA clarified that fee basis provider duties must be related to direct patient care activities, which prevented VA from paying providers for being on call and available to provide patient care services. In response, the facility halted on-call interventional radiology services, which were later resumed intermittently using facility providers.  

The OIG did not substantiate the allegation that a waiver request should have been submitted prior to the reduction in coverage. However, the OIG substantiated that confusion and deficient communication of intermittent on-call coverage led to a patient being unnecessarily transferred after developing a gastrointestinal bleed, despite services being available at the facility. The resumption of coverage on an intermittent basis was communicated to staff and leaders through emails and daily calls. However, the patient’s intensive care unit (ICU) attending physician and the ICU director were not included in the email communication and did not participate in the daily calls. Further, the ICU fellow who transferred the patient did not consult with the ICU attending physician and the gastroenterology fellow did not document assessing the patient as required. 

The OIG determined that a clinical or institutional disclosure was not conducted, facility leaders did not conduct a comprehensive review of the event to understand staff’s involvement, and quality management staff did not process a related patient safety report in accordance with VHA policy.

The Facility Director concurred with the six recommendations and shared plans and actions taken to address communication, documentation, disclosure, patient safety reporting, mitigation of risks that contributed to the transfer, and rejected patient safety reports. 

Report Type
Inspection / Evaluation
Location

IN
United States

Number of Recommendations
6
Questioned Costs
$0
Funds for Better Use
$0
Report updated under NDAA 5274
No

Open Recommendations

This report has 5 open recommendations.
Recommendation Number Significant Recommendation Recommended Questioned Costs Recommended Funds for Better Use Additional Details
02 No $0 $0

The Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center Director ensures that residents, fellows, and clinical service leaders understand and follow the requirement to document complete and pertinent information, including assessments and recommendations, in patients’ electronic health records.

03 No $0 $0

The Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center Director educates providers on the requirements related to completing a clinical disclosure when an adverse event occurs, such as a delay in care.

04 No $0 $0

The Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center Director ensures the episode of care related to the patient’s transfer is reviewed to determine whether an institutional disclosure is needed in accordance with Veterans Health Administration requirements, and takes action as warranted.

05 No $0 $0

The Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center Director monitors to ensure that Joint Patient Safety Reporting system reports are included or rejected in accordance with Veterans Health Administration guidance.

06 No $0 $0

The Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center Director ensures a comprehensive review of the patient’s care and transfer is completed to identify factors that contributed to the patient’s unnecessary transfer and takes action as warranted.

Department of Veterans Affairs OIG

United States