Open Recommendations

District leaders and the Detroit, Escanaba, and Cincinnati Vet Center Directors collaborate with the supporting VA medical facility to determine reasons for noncompliance with staff participation on the mental health executive council, take action as indicated, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Fort Wayne, Escanaba, and Cincinnati Vet Center Directors determine reasons for noncompliance with completing four hours of external clinical consultation for clinically complex cases per month, ensure a process is implemented, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Detroit and Escanaba Vet Center Directors determine reasons for noncompliance with employees completing select trainings in the required time frame, ensure completion, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Fort Wayne, Detroit, Escanaba, and Cincinnati Vet Center Directors determine reasons for noncompliance with completion of an outreach plan with all required strategic components, ensure completion, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Escanaba Vet Center Director determine reasons for noncompliance with annual fire or safety inspections, ensure completion, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Fort Wayne, Detroit, and Escanaba Vet Center Directors determine reasons for noncompliance with having an annual risk and vulnerability assessment completed by VA police or local law enforcement, ensure completion, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Cincinnati Vet Center Director determine reasons for noncompliance with annual automated external defibrillator servicing by VA medical center biomedical engineering, ensure completion, and monitor compliance.

District leaders and the Detroit and Escanaba Vet Center Directors determine reasons for noncompliance with having a current emergency and crisis plan that includes required components, ensure completion, and monitor compliance.

The Readjustment Counseling Service Chief Officer reviews the administrative site visit protocol and Veterans Health Administration requirements related to inconsistencies in frequency for risk and vulnerability assessments and updates the administrative site visit protocol as indicated.

The Readjustment Counseling Service Chief Officer reviews the administrative site visit protocol and Veterans Health Administration requirements related to automated external defibrillator annual servicing and updates the administrative site visit protocol as indicated.

1. We recommend that the Cannon House
Office Building Renewal Project’s
contracting officials require the
Construction Manager as Constructor to
obtain an explanation on subcontractors’
non-responsiveness to the Office of
Inspector General’s audit request.

We recommend that the Architect of the
Capitol’s contracting officials use
contractual remedies to ensure
compliance with the Examination of
Records clause

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.

The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.