Open Recommendations

Direct UF to establish clear guidance regarding the allowability of publication expenses on sponsored projects, including the need to acknowledge NSF funding sources.

Resolve the $83,227 in questioned supplies, software, severance and publication costs for which UF has not agreed to reimburse NSF and direct UF to repay or otherwise remove the sustained questioned costs from its NSF awards.

Direct UF to provide documentation that it has repaid or otherwise credited the $29,600 in questioned lab supplies, materials, travel costs, and tuition fees for which it has agreed to reimburse NSF.

Direct UF to strengthen its administrative and management procedures, internal controls, and processes for allocating salary, publication, material and supply, travel, and tuition expenses to sponsored projects. Processes could include: a. Requiring Principal Investigators or other designated staff to both document and justify the allocation methodologies they use to charge expenses to sponsored projects. b. Establishing clear guidance regarding the treatment of severance pay, including how to reasonably allocate expenses of this nature to sponsored projects. c. Establishing clear guidance and training regarding the allowability of publication costs. Specifically, the guidance and training should emphasize the requirement that personnel (i)…

Direct UF to provide documentation that it has repaid or otherwise credited the $1,717 of questioned graduate student stipend costs for which it has agreed to reimburse NSF.

Direct UF to update its current procedures and internal controls for reviewing stipend costs charged to Graduate Research Fellowship Program awards. Updated procedures should require UF to periodically review all stipend payments to ensure that UF appropriately calculated the stipend amounts paid.

Direct UF to strengthen its directives/procedures and internal controls for procuring goods and services related to sponsored projects. Processes could include: a. Conducting annual training for those individuals who are responsible for approving service expenses that require a sole-source justification form, a requisition form, and appropriate approvals before the vendor or consultant begins providing the services. b. Implementing a control to flag purchases of goods and services that exceed the thresholds identified in UF’s current procurement policies.

Direct UF to strengthen its directives/procedures and internal controls surrounding the completion of Cost Accounting Standards exemptions. Specifically, the updated procedures should prevent UF from charging general-purpose computing devices directly to sponsored projects without a documented, approved exemption.

Direct UF to strengthen its directives/procedures and internal controls for incurring travel costs related to sponsored projects. Processes could include conducting annual training for those individuals who charge travel expenses to federally sponsored projects. The training should specifically address how to ensure that the individuals obtained the appropriate advance approvals for student travel, that they are receiving the appropriate per diem rate, and that they settle and complete travel advances and expense reports in a timely manner.

Direct UF to update its current award set-up practices to require that, when setting up accounts established for NSF awards, personnel ensure that the accounts apply indirect costs using the rates that were established in the Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement in effect as of the date of the NSF grant award, rather than using the rates included within the original grant proposal.

We recommend that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services review the list of 100 error-prone providers identified in this audit and take specific action as appropriate, such as prior authorization, prepayment reviews, and postpayment review.

We recommend that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services use annual CERT data to identify individual providers that have an increased risk of receiving improper payments and apply additional program integrity tools to these providers.

Update the I-9 Guide to include minimum elements ICE officials must document in case files to justify fine reductions.

Assess I-9 processes and update the I-9 Guide to ensure it addresses risks and challenges, including:a. when employers make corrections to address substantive violations and when employers claim they were unaware that they employed Unauthorized Alien Workers;b. ICE’s ability to conduct follow-up inspections with limited resources; andc. when I-9 inspections identify individuals using fraudulent documents to obtain unlawful employment.

Develop and implement a quality assurance process that allows ICE headquarters to sample cases on an objective, periodic basis, to determine whether field offices reduce fines, issue compliance letters, and conduct follow-up inspections of employers in accordance with ICE policies and procedures.

Conduct an assessment of the IMAGE program to determine whether implementation of other approaches would aid in achieving its outreach goal and be cost effective, or if funds should be put to better use.

Establish guidance and procedures for U.S. Marshals Service staff to follow in working with the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement case workers to facilitate communication between family unit adults separated from associated family unit minors, especially parents in U.S. Marshals Service custody and their children in Office of Refugee Resettlement custody.

Work with the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement and the Department of Homeland Security to develop a formal interagency agreement (such as a memorandum of understanding) regarding the facilitation of communication between separated children in Office of Refugee Resettlement custody and their parents in U.S. Marshals Service custody.

Work with the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement and the Department of Homeland Security to develop a formal interagency agreement (such as a memorandum of understanding) regarding the facilitation of communication between separated children in Office of Refugee Resettlement custody and their parents in U.S. Marshals Service custody.

Recommendation is not publicly available.

Recommendation is not publicly available.

Recommendation is not publicly available.

Recommendation is not publicly available.

Recommendation is not publicly available.

Review the loans identified as potentially ineligible to determine if the businesses met eligibility requirements. If not, take appropriate action related to loan guaranty and forgiveness.