Congress, NIH, and Federal intelligence agencies have raised concerns about foreign threats to the integrity of U.S. medical research and intellectual property. This includes foreign programs that may unduly influence and capitalize on NIH-funded research. In August 2018, NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins raised concerns that peer reviewers-who review applications for NIH extramural grants and have unique access to confidential information in those applications-were, in some cases, inappropriately sharing this information with foreign entities. Subsequently, Congress appropriated funding for OIG to conduct oversight of NIH grant programs and operations, including examining the effectiveness of NIH's efforts to protect intellectual property derived from NIH-supported research. This study describes and assesses NIH's oversight of peer reviewers' handling of confidential information.
Open Recommendations
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6323 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
NIH should update its training materials routinely to include informationabout breaches of peer reviewer confidentiality and possibleundue foreign influence. | |||||
6324 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
NIH should require all peer reviewers to attend periodic trainings aboutpeer review integrity. | |||||
6322 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
NIH should conduct targeted, risk-based oversight of peer reviewers using analysis of information about threats to research integrity. | |||||
6325 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
NIH should consult with Federal law enforcement and national securityexperts to determine what additional steps it might take toidentify and address potential risks to the confidentiality of thepeer review process, including possible undue foreign influence. |