We contracted with the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), an independent firm, to evaluate the U.S. Census Bureau's EAE operation. The original objective was to determine whether the bureau prepared adequate and timely operational assessments that included the appropriate metrics to support planning for the 2030 decennial’s research and testing. The scope of the objective was later expanded to include the other major EAE components, namely evaluations and experiments. IDA found that (1) 2020 operational assessments, evaluations, and experiments were not completed in time to formally inform the development of the Census Bureau’s 2030 research and testing agenda; (2) the 2020 census EAE research program failed to prioritize the evaluation of two of the four key 2020 innovation areas and the investigation of a potentially significant 2030 innovation; (3) the Census Bureau has put management processes and tools in place but does not always use them to their potential; (4) the Census Bureau should standardize the reporting of cost data across EAE products; (5) the Census Bureau should examine delays with respect to the originally planned schedule and not just the latest re-baselined schedule; and (6) the Census Bureau should resource-load the activities in the decennial census integrated master schedule.
Open Recommendations
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
1. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau ensure that the 2030 EAE reports are released in a timely manner. | |||||
2 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
2. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau establish a formal process to share recommendations and lessons learned from the EAE operation prior to the internal release of EAE reports, with the intention of expediting the incorporation of feedback that is crucial to the next decennial's research and testing. | |||||
4 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
4. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau utilize existing processes and tools as intended in order to ensure rigorous and disciplined management of the decennial census. | |||||
5 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
5. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau ensure that integrated project teams (IPTS) responsible for OAs provide the required report elements and document when required report elements are not available or transparency is not permissible. | |||||
6 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
6. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau develop guidelines for the querying and reporting of cost data that permit comparisons between planned and actual costs. | |||||
7 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
7. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau extend the Bureau's analysis of scheduling delays to examine variances between originally planned baseline start and finish dates and actual start and finish dates. | |||||
8 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
8. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau use what is learned from this analysis to improve its scheduling estimates for the next decennial census. | |||||
10 | Yes | $0 | $0 | ||
10. We recommend that the Director of the Census Bureau develop mechanisms to better account for the required resources to complete EAE activities to aid in the planning and execution of future EAE operations. |