Federal Reports

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $16.6 million in funds received by the Rhode Island Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized by Sections 101 and 251 of HAVA in accordance with HAVA and applicable requirements; (2) Accurately and properly accounted for property purchased with HAVA payments and for program income; and (3) met HAVA requirements for Section 251 funds for an election fund and for a matching contribution.

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $28.7 million in funds received by the Iowa Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized by Sections 101 and 251 of HAVA in accordance with HAVA and applicable requirements; (2) Accurately and properly accounted for property purchased with HAVA payments and for program income; and (3) met HAVA requirements for Section 251 funds for an election fund and for a matching contribution.

We conducted four reviews to determine whether each coal supplier was in compliance with weighing and sampling provisions of the respective contract. We performed tests to verify that shipment weight documentation maintained at each mine supported the amounts used to support invoices to TVA for tonnage shipped. In summary, our reviews found documentation maintained at the respective mine for ten randomly selected shipments agreed with the information provided to TVA regarding tons shipped. Each supplier was also found to be in general compliance with the weighing and sampling requirements of the contracts. However, we did identify a few issues requiring management action related to bias testing. Specifically, we recommended the General Manager, TVA Fuel Supply:Include in future coal contracts a specific frequency requirement pertaining to the periodic bias testing of samplers.Follow up with one coal supplier to either identify a method of bias testing that is acceptable or amend the contract to extend the period in which the samplers need to be bias tested.Follow up with one coal supplier regarding correction of the qualified opinion received from the independent lab in its 2009 dynamic bias test of Sampler #2 and determine whether any further corrective actions are warranted when current bias test results are received.TVA management generally agreed with our findings and recommendations and plans to take corrective action. Summary Only