An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of the Treasury
FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL: Assessing OCC's Examination of OFAC Compliance Was Hampered by Limited Documentation
Audit of Corporation for National and Community Service Grant Awarded to Kentucky Department for Mental Health and Mental Retardation Services Foster Grandparents Program
We compared Gallatin Fossil Plant (GAF) coal receipts using TVA and terminal shipment weights to identify whether any significant variances exist. Our review covered December 1, 2005, to May 3, 2006. We determined (1) coal receipt information input into FuelWorx (FWX) and the Daily Coal Report (DCR) were generally accurate and (2) significant variances exist between vendor/terminal invoiced weights and TVA delivered weights. Specifically:All but 1 of the 64 tested coal shipments were input into FWX and the DCR accurately. The net effect of all terminal versus TVA weight variances shows that TVA received approximately 31,000 tons more coal than reported on the terminal shipping notices. We also noted that when TVA weights are unavailable, terminal weights are input as TVA weights. Two additional issues cited by GAF personnel were that (1) the responsible individual is not always informed when TVA weights are unavailable and (2) not all scale personnel receive formalized training.TVA management agreed with our findings and recommendations and has taken or plans to take corrective action.
At the request of TVA Nuclear (TVAN), we reviewed Stone and Webster Engineering Corporations' (SWEC) craft labor time reporting associated with the October 2005 Unit 1 Restart craft labor switch to five eight-hour straight-time work schedules. In 2005, TVA and the Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council modified their memorandum of understanding, including Attachment A, Mandatory ? Eight/Ten Straight-Time Attendance Agreement (LRS-54). The change was made to increase productivity (e.g., to curtail absenteeism and tardiness). To comply, SWEC switched to five eight-hour days straight-time work schedules in October of 2005. SWEC developed the following key control activities to ensure compliance with LRS-54.The AnalyzeTime application evaluates payroll data to identify inconsistencies and potential errors in time calculations. Timesheets, which support payroll payments, are prepared and signed by a foreman and then approved by an applicable supervisor. Gate-log reports are available to identify time reporting variances for employees working inside the secured area. We determined (1) the AnalyzeTime application is working as intended, (2) over 99 percent of timesheets reviewed contained all required signatures, and (3) gate-log reviews are being conducted; however, these reviews provide only limited information for monitoring. We also noted that:Absences are not tracked when an employee is temporarily assigned to another unit. No process exists to ensure that excused absences are monitored to identify potential abuse.
EAC OIG reviewed $77.3 million in funds received by the Georgia Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objective of the review was to determine whether Georgia (1) managed HAVA funds in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments (the Common Rule) and the Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments (Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87) and (2) complied with HAVA requirements for maintaining the election fund and sustaining the State's level of expenditures for elections.
KPMG LLP, the auditor under contract having performed the audit of the United States Mint’s Fiscal Year 2005 Financial Statements, has withdrawn its opinion on the financial statements as a result of subsequent discovery of material errors. Accordingly, the previously issued independent auditors' report and management letter associated with the financial statements have been removed from the OIG websiteand Oversight.gov): Audit of the United States Mint's Fiscal Year 2005 Financial Statements, report number OIG‐06‐031, dated June 28, 2006 (RECALLED BY AUDITORS)