An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Defense
Evaluation of the DoD Military Working Dog Program’s Management of Canine Welfare
Beginning in 2021, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted several audits to assess HUD’s anti-fraud efforts and to develop inventories of fraud risks for several of its programs. Our previous work found that HUD’s fraud risk management program was in its early stages of development and we recommended that HUD perform program-specific fraud risk assessments and incorporate these assessments into an agency-wide plan to further advance its program. To continue assisting HUD in improving its anti-fraud efforts, we conducted this work to identify potential fraud risks and schemes that could negatively impact HUD’s Single Family Housing program. Our objective was to assist HUD by developing an inventory of fraud risks for its Single Family Housing program.
As part of a larger effort by the HUD Office of Housing Operational Risk Division that included developing fraud risk inventories for all components of the Office of Housing, HUD created a fraud risk inventory for the Single Family Housing program that identified 28 fraud risks or schemes and covered many aspects of the program including appraisal, application, origination, servicing, invoices, and claims. We identified five overall fraud risk factors that increase the chance of fraud occurring in the program by increasing the incentive, opportunity, and likelihood for an individual considering committing fraud. We used these fraud risk factors, along with the results of brainstorming sessions, interviews, and reviews of audit reports, investigations, and press releases from HUD OIG and other agencies, to develop an inventory of 64 potential fraud schemes that HUD had not previously identified. These schemes could be used to defraud the Single Family Housing program and undermine its integrity, resulting in an increased risk to the FHA insurance fund, borrowers, and lenders.
We recommend that the HUD Office of Single Family Housing (1) use the OIG’s fraud risk inventory included in this report to enhance its Single Family program-specific fraud risk inventory, (2) include lenders and servicers in the fraud risk identification process and communicate the risks and schemes identified for the Single Family Housing program to relevant stakeholders, and (3) incorporate data and system enhancements into its plans to improve HUD’s ability to monitor and respond to fraud risks in the Single Family Housing program.
The Integrated Financial and Acquisition Management System (iFAMS) is a comprehensive financial management system intended to replace multiple legacy systems and combine both acquisition and financial functions. iFAMS, as part of the system’s financial-related functionality, contains sensitive acquisition information like pricing and labor rates. This information must be protected. The VA OIG conducted this audit to determine whether iFAMS user access controls that are intended to limit account privileges are sufficient to safeguard VA data and comply with applicable laws, regulations, and guidance.
The OIG found access was not sufficiently limited as required for all 20 Technology Acquisition Center (TAC) users sampled. The team determined 91 percent of the 2,818 users with access to TAC data did not work for TAC but were requesting access to TAC information as of February 2025. Additionally, 78 percent of these users had roles that granted exceptionally broad access to sensitive acquisition information, presenting widespread risk of unnecessary access.
This risk occurred, in part, because iFAMS access controls were too broad. Additionally, quality reviews did not capture all access granted to a user. Finally, the electronic tool that is available for supervisors and information owners to routinely see user roles and accesses does not show all accesses the users have been granted.
Unnecessary access could compromise sensitive acquisition data in iFAMS. With every additional user who can access sensitive information, the risk of misuse increases. VA concurred with the OIG’s three recommendations to improve iFAMS access controls before the system is implemented further.
KPMG LLP’s (KPMG) report on its financial statement audit of the National Credit Union Administration’s (NCUA) financial statements, which includes the Share Insurance Fund, the Operating Fund, the Central Liquidity Facility, and the Community Development Revolving Loan Fund, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. The NCUA prepared financial statements in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-136 Revised, Financial Reporting Requirements, and subjected them to audit. Under a contract monitored by the NCUA OIG, KPMG, an independent certified public accounting firm, performed an audit of NCUA’s financial statements as of December 31, 2025. The contract required that the audit be performed in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, OMB audit guidance, and the Government Accountability Office/President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency Financial Audit Manual. KPMG’s audit report for 2025 includes: (1) an opinion on the financial statements, (2) conclusions on internal control over financial reporting, and (3) a section addressing compliance and other matters. In its audit of the NCUA, KPMG found:• The financial statements were fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,• There were no deficiencies in internal control identified as material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and• No instances of reportable noncompliance with laws and regulations it tested or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards or OMB guidance.
Management Letter for the Deficiencies in Internal Control over Cash Management Systems at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service Identified during the Audit of the Department of the Treasury’s Consolidated Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2025
This audit was performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) on behalf of the Department of Energy’s Office of Inspector General and examined Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC’s (FFPO) costs incurred and claimed for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 under management and operating contract No. DE-FE0011020.
The audit’s objective was to determine if costs charged to Department Contract No. DE-FE0011010 for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 were allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and contract terms.
The DCAA performed the audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
The DCAA identified three audit findings and questioned over $2.5 million in: (1) direct labor costs associated with unallowable recruitment costs for a seconded employee, unreasonable labor costs, and overtime premiums unallowable per contract terms; (2) travel costs associated with relocation and per diem expenses; and (3) other direct costs associated with home office expenses that were unallowable per contract terms. In addition to the questioned costs noted, the DCAA reported two scope limitations, which prevented it from determining whether certain subcontract costs were fair and reasonable.
If the issues identified by the DCAA are fully addressed, it should help ensure that costs charged to the Department are allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and contract terms.
FFPO responded to the audit findings during an exit conference and provided a written response that is included in the DCAA’s audit report. FFPO concurred with the portion of the questioned direct labor costs pertaining to a retention bonus but did not concur with the other questioned costs related to direct labor, direct travel, and other direct costs.
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the Healthcare Facility Inspection of the VA Central California Health Care System in Fresno.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued seven recommendations for VA to correct identified deficiencies in three domains: 1. Environment of care • Badge holder responsibilities • Signs • Privacy curtains, preventive equipment maintenance, splash resistant bottom shelves • Expired, damaged, and contaminated medications • Pharmaceutical grade medication refrigerators 2. Primary care • Staffing 3. Veteran-centered safety net • Housing and Urban Development–Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing program staffing