Open Recommendations
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Direct staff to conduct an analysis to determine suggested policy changes to further reduce the impact of a potential future loss of a Board quorum on EXIM’s medium- and long-term lending. | |||||
2 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Direct staff to conduct an analysis to determine what changes should be made to further mitigate the risks to EXIM’s medium- and long-term export credit financing that were generated by the lack of Board quorum. | |||||
3 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Direct staff to conduct a study exploring the potential for varying EXIM’s domestic content requirement by industry or sector for all exporters—not just those that qualify under the narrow exceptions of the CTEP program—and adopt policy changes to reflect any modifications or revisions to domestic content requirements based on the results of the study. | |||||
6 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Direct the Senior Vice President for Policy Analysis and International Relations to seek updates to EXIM’s MOU with MARAD to reflect changes in EXIM’s policies and priorities and consider revisiting the $20 million threshold for U.S.-flagged shipping. | |||||
7 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Develop a comprehensive plan, in coordination with MARAD, to provide clearer and more effective guidance on EXIM’s website for U.S. exporters to assist them in complying with EXIM’s domestic shipping requirements and procedures, including processes for requesting a MARAD waiver on the use of U.S. flagged vessels. | |||||
8 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
In advance of EXIM’s next reauthorization, engage with interagency stakeholders to develop proposals that address the challenges associated with the impact on EXIM’s competitiveness of requiring exporters to use U.S. flagged shipping vessels. | |||||
10 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
In advance of EXIM’s next reauthorization, engage with interagency stakeholders to develop legislative proposals that would modify the agency’s charter to address the limitation in Sec. 2(a)(2), which prevents EXIM from matching recent updates to the OECD Arrangement. | |||||
12 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Have the Office of General Counsel support efforts to consider recommendation of revisions to the Board’s delegated authority policy to allow for expedited reviews of larger deals, particularly when there is no Board quorum. | |||||
14 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Support a study led by the Office of Human Capital, strategic planning, and other internal stakeholders, to identify specific factors impacting EXIM’s ability to attract and retain staff and implement recommendations to address workforce recruitment, retention, and succession planning needs in this area. |