Open Recommendations
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should ensure that collaborative teams have measurable outcomes to track program effectiveness. | |||||
2 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should develop and implement a quality review process for collaborative teams. | |||||
3 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should develop and implement a method to monitor collaborative teams through a dashboard view. | |||||
4 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should develop guidance to ensure consistent executive oversight for collaborative teams. | |||||
5 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should develop additional performance measures to assess whether systemic advocacy projects are effective in addressing systemic issues. | |||||
7 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should ensure that management addresses staffing issues and timely reassigns inventory when delays are identified in the SAMS issue review. | |||||
9 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should analyze trends in issues raised in SAMS to help ensure that emerging issues are identified and addressed before they become more widespread. | |||||
10 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should revise guidance to contain clear criteria for the SIRE project manager to identify emerging systemic issues submitted to SAMS, including developing a method to track and monitor. | |||||
11 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
The TAS, Executive Director, Systemic Advocacy, should develop a system to track and monitor systemic issues closed when additional monitoring is needed to ensure that the issue is addressed. |