The audit objectives were to determine whether program funds were managed in accordance with the ARC and Federal grant requirements.
Scranton, PA
United States
The audit objectives were to determine whether program funds were managed in accordance with the ARC and Federal grant requirements.
Scranton, PA
United States
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
25-11-01 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
We recommend that Johnson College implement its existing procurement policy, by requiring that the minimum number of price quotations are received and documented for each procurement action | |||||
25-11-02 | No | $72,122 | $0 | ||
We recommend that Johnson College work with ARC, to resolve the $72,122 of questioned matching costs. | |||||
25-11-03 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Since the grant period had ended and the reporting section of ARC portal is no longer accessible, we recommend that Johnson College’s management communicate with the ARC grant coordinator to request access to the portal in order to resubmit the missing SF-270 and Performance Progress reports. | |||||
25-11-04 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
We recommend that Johnson College’s management review and update its internal grant management procedures to include clearer guidelines on reporting during all phases of a grant, including during no-cost extension periods. Additionally, grant staff should receive training to ensure that they are aware of their reporting responsibilities. |