Open Recommendations
| Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| The Chief, Appeals, the National Taxpayer Advocate, and the Commissioner, TE/GE Division, should discuss the 29 instances of noncompliance with RRA 98 § 1204(b) due to missing or unsigned documents with the responsible managers to ensure that they understand the retention standard documentation requirements. | |||||
| 2 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| The Chief, Appeals, the National Taxpayer Advocate, and the Commissioner, TE/GE Division, should discuss the 37 instances where the retention standard was not acknowledged timely with the responsible managers, so employees are aware of the standard to treat taxpayers fairly and equitably. | |||||
| 3 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| The Chief, Appeals and the Commissioner, TE/GE Division, should discuss the six instances of the “Not Applicable” retention standard ratings with the responsible managers so they understand that all employees should be rated on the retention standard. | |||||
| 5 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| The Human Capital Officer should revise the quarterly self-certification questions to clarify the language used for the responses to increase the accuracy of the certification results and potential ROTERs reported. | |||||