Skip to main content
Date Issued
Submitting OIG
Department of Transportation OIG
Other Participating OIGs
Department of Transportation OIG
Agencies Reviewed/Investigated
Department of Transportation
Components
Federal Aviation Administration
Report Number
ZA2024019
Report Description

What We Looked At    Each year, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) procures billions of dollars in information technologies (IT) and telecommunications (telecom) products and services in support of its mission to provide the safest and most efficient aerospace system in the world. For fiscal year 2024, the Agency requested approximately $3.9 billion for its IT and telecom needs. Our prior audit of the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) IT shared services contract vehicles identified issues with DOT’s award and modification practices. Given our previous findings, and the high dollar amounts FAA expends for IT and telecom services, we initiated this audit. Our objective was to evaluate FAA’s practices for awarding and modifying its IT and telecom contracts. We focused our review on the award and modification practices associated with (1) determining sound pricing and (2) promoting competition. What We FoundFAA’s noncompliant IT and telecom contracting practices inhibit establishment of sound pricing. Per the Agency’s Acquisition Management System (AMS), procurement teams are required to conduct price and, at times, cost analyses, and program offices must develop sound independent Government cost estimates (IGCEs) prior to contract awards. However, FAA officials could not provide the required price and cost analyses for 3 of 26 sample contracts or the required IGCE for 1 of these 3 contracts. Additionally, FAA developed inadequate IGCEs for 16 sample contracts. Without adequate IGCEs, FAA lacks a critical pricing tool to help conduct price analysis, detect unreasonable offerors, and establish sound pricing. FAA’s IT and telecom contract award and modification actions also restrict competition. Specifically, FAA extended contracts noncompetitively, expanded the scope of a contract noncompetitively, and made questionable noncompetitive award decisions. These actions were largely due to the Agency’s lack of sufficient procurement planning and unclear guidance in AMS. As a result, FAA denies other firms the opportunity to deliver IT and telecom products and services. Our RecommendationsWe made seven recommendations to strengthen FAA’s IT and telecom contract award and modification practices. FAA concurred with all seven recommendations. We consider all recommendations resolved but open pending completion of planned actions.  

Report Type
Audit
Agency Wide
Yes
Number of Recommendations
0
Questioned Costs
$0
Funds for Better Use
$311,611,640

Open Recommendations

This report has 3 open recommendations.
Recommendation Number Significant Recommendation Recommended Questioned Costs Recommended Funds for Better Use Additional Details
4 Yes $0 $0

Update the Acquisition Management System (AMS) to specify what program offices are required to provide as part of an IT and telecom procurement request package. This documentation should include standard lead times for obtaining the Chief Financial Officers approval, submitting complete procurement packages, and references to guidance on how to develop sound IGCEs and complete requirements.

5 Yes $0 $0

Update AMS to include limitations on how long contracts can be extended.

6 Yes $0 $0

Implement written guidance to explain what authorities are appropriate to use to extend contracts beyond their initial performance periods, including any limitations associated with using each authority.

Department of Transportation OIG

United States