Under the prospective payment system (PPS), Medicare pays home health agencies (HHAs) for each 60 day episode of care that beneficiary receives, called a payment episode. During our audit period, if an HHA provided four or fewer visits in a payment episode, Medicare paid the HHA a standardized per-visit payment. Claims for these types of payments are called Low Utilization Payment Adjustment (LUPA) claims. Once a fifth visit was provided during the payment episode (i.e., above the LUPA threshold), Medicare paid an amount for the services provided that was, in general, substantially higher than the per-visit payment amount. Because of the large payment increase starting with the fifth visit, HHAs have an incentive to improperly bill claims with visits slightly above the LUPA threshold.
Open Recommendations
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
269057 | No | $41,613 | $0 | ||
Direct the MACs to recover the $41,613 in identified overpayments made to HHAs for the sampled claims. | |||||
269058 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
Require the MACs to perform data analysis and risk assessments of claims with visits slightly above the applicable LUPA threshold and target these claims for additional review. | |||||
269059 | No | $0 | $191,773,995 | ||
Instruct the MACs to educate HHA providers on properly billing for home health services with visits slightly above the applicable LUPA threshold, which could have saved Medicare as much as $191,773,995 during our audit period. |