We found that UCRC misclassified its agreements and did not verify whether subcontractors were on an exclusions list prior to awarding funds.
Open Recommendations
| Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-WR-007-01 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| We recommend that BOR Direct the Upper Colorado River Commission to develop and implement controls to ensure it considers Federal guidance in 2 C.F.R. 200.331 when it classifies agreements and documents justifications for its classifications. | |||||
| 2024-WR-007-03 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| We recommend that BOR direct the Upper Colorado River Commission to develop and implement policies and procedures in compliance with 2 C.F.R Part 1400 and 2 C.F.R. Part 180 to document review of the System for Award Management exclusions list before issuing agreements that use Federal funds. | |||||
| 2024-WR-007-02 | No | $0 | $0 | ||
| We recommend that BOR to the extent the Upper Colorado River Commission classifies agreements as subawards, direct the Upper Colorado River Commission to develop a mechanism to ensure adherence to applicable Federal subaward requirements, including guidance for performing risk assessments, determining monitoring plans, and reporting subawards to USASpending.gov, as required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. | |||||