Open Recommendations
Recommendation Number | Significant Recommendation | Recommended Questioned Costs | Recommended Funds for Better Use | Additional Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No | $0 | $0 | Status as of February 28, 2025 | |
(U) Establish requirements for regularly soliciting input from judges eligible to participate in the HIDS program, evaluating the judges' input, and assessing the feasibility of implementing changes that will increase HIDS program enrollment and help ensure current participants remain enrolled in the program. | |||||
3 | No | $0 | $0 | Status as of February 28, 2025 | |
(U) Track alarm monitoring participation rates, consider feedback from judges about why they choose not to obtain monitoring services, and make any necessary changes to the HIDS program to maximize the number of judges electing to include alarm monitoring in their HIDS configuration. | |||||
4 | No | $0 | $0 | Status as of February 28, 2025 | |
(U) Require district JSls to conduct residential security surveys of the home of all HIDS participants upon their enrollment in the program, unless the participant specifically declines. | |||||
6 | No | $0 | $0 | Status as of February 28, 2025 | |
(U) Update the HIDS Program Guide to identify and define the authorities, qualifications, roles, and responsibilities of all individuals tasked with facilitating, executing, and overseeing the HIDS program. | |||||
7 | No | $0 | $0 | Status as of February 28, 2025 | |
(U) Update the HIDS Program Guide to require all appropriate JSD personnel to complete periodic HIDS training and track the completion of any HIDS training for all attendees. | |||||
9 | No | $0 | $0 | Status as of February 28, 2025 | |
(U) Reevaluate its appeal policy and process and implement any necessary changes to ensure the timeliness of appeal decisions, such as tracking the date all documentation is received. |