Skip to main content
Report File
Date Issued
Submitting OIG
Department of Defense OIG
Agencies Reviewed/Investigated
Department of Defense
Report Number
DODIG-2025-083
Report Type
Audit
Agency Wide
Yes
Questioned Costs
$0
Funds for Better Use
$0
Report updated under NDAA 5274
No

Open Recommendations

This report has 9 open recommendations.
Recommendation Number Significant Recommendation Recommended Questioned Costs Recommended Funds for Better Use Additional Details
D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0001.A1 No $0 $0

Rec. A.1: The DoD OIG recommended that the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy, establish and implement additional training on awarding lowest price technically acceptable contracts or clarify best practices for lowest price technically acceptable awards to ensure contracting personnel understand and follow the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement requirements.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0002.A2 No $0 $0

Rec. A.2: The DoD OIG recommended that the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement), require contracting personnel to review the file for the contract that did not include a lowest price technically acceptable justification, and if a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was appropriate, add a justification to the file, as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. If a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was not appropriate, require contracting personnel to determine the appropriate action to continue with the existing contract, or terminate and recompete the contract.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0003.A3a No $0 $0

Rec. A.3.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition) require contracting personnel to review the file for the three contracts that did not include a lowest price technically acceptable justification and if a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was appropriate, add a justification to the file, as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. If a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was not appropriate, require contracting personnel to determine the appropriate action to continue with the existing contract, or terminate and recompete the contract.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0003.A3b No $0 $0

Rec. A.3.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition) require contracting personnel to review the two contracts awarded as lowest price technically acceptable awards that may have been more appropriate using a different source selection process and require contracting personnel to determine the appropriate action to continue with the existing contract, or terminate and recompete the contract.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0004.A4a No $0 $0

Rec. A.4.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Contracting) require contracting personnel to review the file for the three contracts that did not include a lowest price technically acceptable justification and if a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was appropriate, add a justification to the file, as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. If a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was not appropriate, require contracting personnel to determine the appropriate action to continue with the existing contract, or terminate and recompete the contract.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0004.A4b No $0 $0

Rec. A.4.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Contracting) require contracting personnel to review the contract awarded as a lowest price technically acceptable award that may have been more appropriate using a different source selection process and require contracting personnel to determine the appropriate action to continue with the existing contract, or terminate and recompete the contract.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0001-0005.A5 No $0 $0

Rec. A.5: The DoD OIG recommended that the Director, Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity require contracting personnel to review the file for the contract that did not include a lowest price technically acceptable justification and if a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was appropriate, add a justification to the file, as required by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. If a lowest price technically acceptable source selection was not appropriate, require contracting personnel to determine the appropriate action to continue with the existing contract, or terminate and recompete the contract.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0002-0001.B1a No $0 $0

Rec. B.1.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy assess the deficiencies identified in this report and develop and implement processes, procedures, and guidance sufficient to ensure the data contracting personnel enter into the Federal Procurement Data System is accurate through either additional training, data entry controls, or oversight of the data.

D-2025-0083-D000AX-0002-0001.B1b No $0 $0

Rec. B.1.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy direct the Services and other Defense agencies to require contracting personnel to review and correct contract actions that were incorrectly labeled as lowest price technically acceptable awards in the Federal Procurement Data System.

Department of Defense OIG

United States