| D-2024-0123-D000AX-0001-0001.A1a |
No |
$126,422 |
$0 |
|
|
Rec. A.1.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command conduct a review of six stock numbers reviewed by this audit for which Air Force personnel could not provide evidence of full restitution. If the review determines that the contractor did not provide restitution and the Air Force can still pursue restitution under the contract terms, require the applicable Air Force contracting officer to pursue restitution for the $500,000 from the contractor that provided defective parts. Also, comment on the $500,000 in questioned costs related to defective parts for which the Air Force was unable to provide evidence of contractor restitution. If the Commander disagrees with the questioned costs, identify the amount and the reason.
|
| D-2024-0123-D000AX-0001-0001.A1b |
No |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
Rec. A.1.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command update Air Force Technical Order 00-35D-54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R),"August 15, 2022, to provide details on the process for obtaining restitution from contractors that provide defective parts. The guidance should identify key roles and responsibilities and require the involvement of the responsible contracting officer in the process. The guidance should also require personnel to preserve an audit trail to support the receipt of restitution and specify the type of documentation needed. Upon completion of the updates, establish a program to provide recurring training to Air Force deficiency reporting personnel and monitor compliance with the requirement.
|
| D-2024-0123-D000AX-0001-0001.A1c |
No |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
Rec. A.1.c: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command develop and implement controls and oversight to ensure tracking of contractor restitution from the completion of the investigation of the report on deficiencies in product quality through the receipt of restitution.
|
| D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1a |
No |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
Rec. B.1.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command require C-130J aircraft deficiency reporting personnel to establish a process to track defective C-130J aircraft parts to ensure that the parts are shipped to the contractor and repaired or replaced under warranty. Also, comment on the $3 million in questioned costs related to defective parts the Air Force was unable to recover and $200,000 in questioned costs the Air Force incurred to repair defective parts under warranty. If the Commander disagrees with the questioned costs, identify the amount and the reason.
|
| D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1b |
No |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
Rec. B.1.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command require C-130J aircraft deficiency reporting personnel to develop warranty guidance and communicate the guidance among the appropriate using communities in accordance with Air Force Technical Order 00-35D-54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R)," August 15, 2022.
|
| D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1d |
No |
$0 |
$0 |
|
|
Rec. B.1.d: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command conduct a review of other major Air Force weapon system programs receiving new deliveries with contract warranty terms similar to the C-130J aircraft contract and ensure that the responsible deficiency reporting personnel are following Air Force Technical Order 00?35D?54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R)," August 15, 2022, for defective parts under warranty. If the review identifies the same conditions identified by this audit, require Air Force deficiency reporting personnel to establish and implement a corrective action plan.
|
