Skip to main content
Report File
Date Issued
Submitting OIG
Department of Defense OIG
Other Participating OIGs
Department of Defense OIG
Agencies Reviewed/Investigated
Department of Defense
Report Number
DODIG-2024-123
Report Type
Audit
Agency Wide
Yes
Number of Recommendations
0
Questioned Costs
$0
Funds for Better Use
$0
Report updated under NDAA 5274
No

Open Recommendations

This report has 7 open recommendations.
Recommendation Number Significant Recommendation Recommended Questioned Costs Recommended Funds for Better Use Additional Details
D-2024-0123-D000AX-0001-0001.A1a No $500,000 $0

Rec. A.1.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command conduct a review of six stock numbers reviewed by this audit for which Air Force personnel could not provide evidence of full restitution. If the review determines that the contractor did not provide restitution and the Air Force can still pursue restitution under the contract terms, require the applicable Air Force contracting officer to pursue restitution for the $500,000 from the contractor that provided defective parts. Also, comment on the $500,000 in questioned costs related to defective parts for which the Air Force was unable to provide evidence of contractor restitution. If the Commander disagrees with the questioned costs, identify the amount and the reason.

D-2024-0123-D000AX-0001-0001.A1b No $0 $0

Rec. A.1.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command update Air Force Technical Order 00-35D-54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R),"August 15, 2022, to provide details on the process for obtaining restitution from contractors that provide defective parts. The guidance should identify key roles and responsibilities and require the involvement of the responsible contracting officer in the process. The guidance should also require personnel to preserve an audit trail to support the receipt of restitution and specify the type of documentation needed. Upon completion of the updates, establish a program to provide recurring training to Air Force deficiency reporting personnel and monitor compliance with the requirement.

D-2024-0123-D000AX-0001-0001.A1c No $0 $0

Rec. A.1.c: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command develop and implement controls and oversight to ensure tracking of contractor restitution from the completion of the investigation of the report on deficiencies in product quality through the receipt of restitution.

D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1a No $0 $0

Rec. B.1.a: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command require C-130J aircraft deficiency reporting personnel to establish a process to track defective C-130J aircraft parts to ensure that the parts are shipped to the contractor and repaired or replaced under warranty. Also, comment on the $3 million in questioned costs related to defective parts the Air Force was unable to recover and $200,000 in questioned costs the Air Force incurred to repair defective parts under warranty. If the Commander disagrees with the questioned costs, identify the amount and the reason.

D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1b No $0 $0

Rec. B.1.b: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command require C-130J aircraft deficiency reporting personnel to develop warranty guidance and communicate the guidance among the appropriate using communities in accordance with Air Force Technical Order 00-35D-54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R)," August 15, 2022.

D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1c No $0 $0

Rec. B.1.c: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command provide recurring training to Air Force deficiency reporting personnel on the warranty requirements for defective parts outlined in Air Force Technical Order 00-35D-54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R)," August 15, 2022.

D-2024-0123-D000AX-0002-0001.B1d No $0 $0

Rec. B.1.d: The DoD OIG recommended that the Commander, Air Force Materiel Command conduct a review of other major Air Force weapon system programs receiving new deliveries with contract warranty terms similar to the C-130J aircraft contract and ensure that the responsible deficiency reporting personnel are following Air Force Technical Order 00?35D?54, "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution (DRI&R)," August 15, 2022, for defective parts under warranty. If the review identifies the same conditions identified by this audit, require Air Force deficiency reporting personnel to establish and implement a corrective action plan.

Department of Defense OIG

United States