Stay Informed
of New Reports
Twitter
Where To Report Waste
Fraud, Abuse, Or Retaliation
Where To Report Waste Fraud, Abuse, Or Retaliation

Inspector General Open Recommendations

08/21/2024 - Department of Transportation GLS Lacks Effective Controls To Reliably Estimate Seaway Infrastructure Program Costs [Report Details] Audit - Open Recommendations

08/20/2024 - Department of Homeland Security Management Alert - ICE Cannot Monitor All Unaccompanied Migrant Children Released from DHS and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Custody [Report Details] Audit - Open Recommendations

08/19/2024 - Federal Housing Finance Agency FHFA Could Enhance Its Supervision of the Federal Home Loan Banks by Incorporating Lessons Learned from the Spring 2023 Bank Failures [Report Details] Inspection / Evaluation - Open Recommendations

EVL-2024-003-4
The Division of Federal Home Loan Bank Regulation should adopt a process to ensure the appropriate examination coverage of all topics within its Examination Manual guidance.
EVL-2024-003-3
FHFA should update the Examination Manual’s Credit Risk Management module and Advances and Collateral module to include guidance on the review of topics and issues related to the Spring 2023 bank failures and otherwise incorporate lessons learned from the 2023 examinations of member credit risk management.
EVL-2024-003-2
The Division of Federal Home Loan Bank Regulation should complete the development and implementation of protocols for DBR personnel to follow in times of member distress and failure, including heightened oversight of the FHLBanks and coordination of communication and actions with the appropriate federal and state regulators.
EVL-2024-003-1
The Division of Federal Home Loan Bank Regulation should issue written guidance on the FHLBanks’ collateral subordination practices.

08/16/2024 - National Science Foundation Performance Audit of Incurred Costs - Brown University [Report Details] Audit - Open Recommendations

5.1
Direct Brown to strengthen its monitoring procedures to ensure it appropriately applies the fringe benefit rates included within its negotiated indirect cost rate agreements.
4.1
Direct Brown to strengthen its internal controls for retaining documentation to support lodging expenses. These updated internal controls could include providing annual training to ensure travelers and individuals responsible for approving travel reimbursements are aware of the documentation required for reimbursement per its institutional policies.
3.4
Direct Brown to strengthen its policies, procedures, and internal control processes for applying its federally negotiated indirect cost rates to NSF awards. These updated policies, procedures, and internal control processes should ensure Brown is: • Appropriately applying its indirect cost rates to all direct costs that should be included in its Modified Total Direct Cost base per its negotiated indirect cost rate agreements. • Accurately classifying all costs for accounts that are included within its Modified Total Direct Cost base per its negotiated indirect cost rate agreements.
3.3
Direct Brown to strengthen its policies, procedures, or internal controls for how to verify—and how to document its verification of—its subawardees’ election to use proposed indirect cost rates. This should address how Brown will ensure that the decision to use proposed indirect cost rates will not result in NSF being overcharged for indirect costs in cases when negotiated rates decrease between the date a subaward is proposed and the date a subaward is awarded, within a single Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement.
3.2
Direct Brown to update its current award set-up practices to: (1) ensure that it sets up accounts for NSF awards, such that each account applies indirect costs using the appropriate rates established in the Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement in effect as of the date of grant award; and/or (2) document its decision to apply indirect costs using lower rates.
3.1
Direct Brown to provide documentation supporting that it has repaid or otherwise credited the $6,671 in questioned indirect costs for which it has agreed to reimburse NSF.
2.4
Direct Brown to update its processes and procedures to require Principal Investigators or other designated staff to both document and justify the allocation methodologies used when charging expenses to NSF awards near grant expiration dates.
2.3
Direct Brown to produce formal written guidance and provide training on how to assess and document the methodology used to allocate publication costs consistent with the benefits received by acknowledged funding sources.
2.2
Direct Brown to provide documentation supporting it has repaid or otherwise credited the $7,204 in questioned materials and supplies expenses for which it has agreed to reimburse NSF.
2.1
Resolve the $17,059 in questioned inappropriately allocated publication costs and direct Brown to repay or otherwise remove the sustained questioned costs from its NSF awards.
1.4
Direct Brown to create additional resources that provide guidance regarding the allowable charging of visa fees on NSF awards. This guidance should address how Brown will ensure it does not charge unallowable long-term visa fees to NSF awards.
1.3
Direct Brown to establish additional guidance regarding how to review invoices and receipts that include materials and supplies charged to NSF awards. This guidance should address how to ensure materials and supplies expenses are allowable and properly allocated to the funding sources that directly benefit from the purchase.

Pages

Displaying 321 - 340 of 14344 recommendations (Grouped by Reports)
Print Current Results to PDF (Maximum of 200 recommendations)